The libertarian approach to crime is both simple and sensible. First, only activities that harm other people should be against the law. So get rid of laws against drugs, gambling, cash deposits, and other victimless crimes. Second, make sure that government behaves properly and respects constitutional rights while investigating and prosecuting criminality. Third, impose appropriate […]
Continue reading Bolstering the 4th Amendment and Strengthening Civil Liberties
. . . → Read More: Bolstering the 4th Amendment and Strengthening Civil Liberties
Donald Trump highlighted Rahm Emanuel’s homicide crisis recently. According to the article, 762 homicides were committed in 2016, which is a 57% increase from 2015. Thus far, Mayor Emanuel has counted on friendly media treatment to essentially sweep this crisis out of sight. Thus far, it’s worked, with the important part of that being ‘thus […]
Continue reading Rahm Emanuel’s homicide crisis
. . . → Read More: Rahm Emanuel’s homicide crisis
What do Andy Johnson, Anthony Smelley, the Hammond family, Charlie Engle, Tammy Cooper, Nancy Black, Russ Caswell, Jacques Wajsfelner, Jeff Councelller, Eric Garner, Martha Boneta, James Slatic, Carole Hinders, Salvatore Culosi, and James Lieto, as well as the Sierra Pacific Company and the entire Meitev family have in common? They are all victims of brutal, […]
Continue reading The Local Government Extortion Racket
. . . → Read More: The Local Government Extortion Racket
Well, what would you do if a bank error gave you access to unlimited funds???
That’s exactly what happened to Luke Moore, a debt-ridden Australian student.
The fun started when he opened a small ‘Complete Freedom’ account with St George Bank. And boy, was it ever fun!
A computer error by the bank gave him an unlimited overdraft based on ‘your excellent credit and balance total’ and our hero decided they meant it. He plunged into a rich playboy lifestyle which included lavish vacations, a a Hyundai Veloceter for $32,000, a $91,000 Aston Martin DB7 Vantage coupe , a $169,000 Maserati,a $54,000 Stressl boat and in his own words, lots of drugs, alcohol and women. He also withdrew wads of cash which he stashed in different accounts.
He was able to pull this off for two years and spent over $1.5 million before the bank finally realized the glitch. After that, he was caught, convicted of fraud and sentenced to 4 years in jail.
But wait, there’s more.
Luke Moore, 29, was released this week after spending five months in jail before he was released on bail. And, yes, he was able to overturn his conviction on appeal on the grounds that his conduct was not ‘deliberately deceptive.’
Americans will be familiar with this as ‘the Clinton defense’ AKA lack of intent. And why not?
Can Luke Moore be blamed because he thought the people at his bank decided to gift him all that money? He just thought they were being nice because, after all, he’s Luke Moore. How was he to know it was an error?
So he’s out, free as a kookaburra and laughing about as loudly, at least inside. As he told the Daily Telegraph he did not miss his lavish multimillionaire lifestyle “besides the cocaine, the strippers and fast cars.”
Living now with his mother in in Goulburn, New South Wales, Moore is ‘readjusting to real life’ but he’s apparently learned an important lesson in how to pull this kind of thing off successfully.
He’s now studying to be a lawyer.
Continue reading What Would YOU Do If A Bank Error Gave You Unlimited Funds???
. . . → Read More: What Would YOU Do If A Bank Error Gave You Unlimited Funds???
When I write about gun control, I generally make two arguments. First, criminals are lawbreakers, so the notion that they will be disarmed because of gun control is a fantasy. Crooks and thugs who really want a gun will always have access to black-market weapons. Second, to the extent that good people obey bad gun-control […]
Continue reading The New York Times (Accidentally) Debunks the Never-Ending Fairy Tale of Gun Control
. . . → Read More: The New York Times (Accidentally) Debunks the Never-Ending Fairy Tale of Gun Control
The War against Cash is a battle that shouldn’t even exist. But politicians don’t like cash because it’s hard to control something that people can freely trade back and forth. So folks on the left are arguing that governments should ban or restrict paper money. In Part I, we looked at the argument that cash […]
Continue reading The War Against Cash, India, and a Lesson about Big Government
. . . → Read More: The War Against Cash, India, and a Lesson about Big Government
When writing about money laundering laws, I’ll sometimes highlight gross abuses by government and I’ll periodically make the usual libertarian arguments about privacy. But I mostly focus on how the laws simply don’t make sense from a cost-benefit perspective. Anti-money laundering laws and regulations impose large burdens on the private sector, which creates disproportionate hardship […]
Continue reading More Inane Developments in the Drug War
. . . → Read More: More Inane Developments in the Drug War
Beginning in the 1970s and 1980s, the federal government (as well as other governments around the world) began to adopt policies based on the idea that crime could be reduced if you somehow could make it very difficult for criminals to use the money they illegally obtain. So we now have a a bunch of […]
Continue reading Money Laundering Laws: Ineffective and Expensive
. . . → Read More: Money Laundering Laws: Ineffective and Expensive
One of the big challenges for libertarians is that we understand “public choice theory.” In other words, we know that people attracted to government will have both the incentive and the power to do bad things, so our quandary is how to give government the authority to provide so-called public goods without sowing the seeds […]
Continue reading If We’re Going to Trust Governments to Enforce Law, then Governments Should Obey Law (and Limit Law)
. . . → Read More: If We’re Going to Trust Governments to Enforce Law, then Governments Should Obey Law (and Limit Law)
This CBS report highlights the fact that Keith Lamont-Scott was a violent man. In fact, the report hints that the world is a better place without him. That isn’t a statement on whether Scott was carrying a gun when he was shot. It’s just a statement that he had a history of being a violent […]
Continue reading Another Democratic myth demolished
. . . → Read More: Another Democratic myth demolished
Elizabeth Barrett Browning started her famous sonnet with “How do I love thee? Let me count the ways” and then proceeded to provide lots of examples If I had similar talent, I would produce a sonnet that began “How is the Drug War a failure? Let me count the ways” because I also could give […]
Continue reading Another Episode of Drug War Lunacy
. . . → Read More: Another Episode of Drug War Lunacy
The thing about the Left is that with Obama in charge, they win even when they lose. After drug dealer Freddie Gray died in police custody, the mob burned down a decent amount of Baltimore, whipped up by ‘activists’ and Marilyn Mosby, the State’s Attorney for Baltimore who actually allowed the mob to have free reign to burn and loot in part of the city while police were ordered to stand down.
The politically motivated charges brought by Marilyn Mosby were thrown out of court as being absolutely absurd, which they were and every one of the six officers were acquitted. her conduct was so egregious that there’s even talk of having her impeached.
The same thing happened in Ferguson, Missouri where Michael Brown robbed a convenience store, assaulted the clerk, tried to wrestle a gun away from a policeman and then was shot by that policeman when he refused to halt and charged him instead with his 300 plus pound body.
In both situations, the Obama Justice Department moved in, did an ‘investigation’ of course found what they called ‘racist behavior’ with little or no actual evidence, sanctioned the police departments for ‘racist behavior’ and demanded wholesale changes…or else.
And of course, they got them, especially in Democrat ruled Baltimore.
But apparently this behavior had unforeseen consequences, as even the notoriously politically correct Washington Post admits, if you read between the lines.
Not only has it become extremely difficult to recruit police in both places, but crime has skyrocketed to the point where residents and business people with an actual stake in their community are begging for more police protection and quicker response time. At the same time, activists and opportunistic politicians, many of whom don’t actually live in these neighborhoods are pushing the Justice department to place more and more restraints on the police.
The result of course is easy to predict. Pro-active policing, the use of police presence to prevent crime before it happens is virtually disappearing. What police officer wants to risk a reprimand or even getting fired by politically correct departments wary of crossing Democrat politicians? Crimes that were often prevented by experienced officers using that legendary ‘sixth sense’ experienced police acquire are now occurring. Arrests in black communities are diminishing – why take a risk of an angry crowd assembling to protest the arrest of a drug dealer or even a traffic stop? Easier and far less risky to just show up after the crime’s been committed and take a report, something that I’m sure infuriates police officers who became cops because of a deep seated desire to protect the innocent.
Eight days had passed since the Justice Department issued a scathing review of the Baltimore Police Department, detailing years of racial discrimination in its law enforcement practices.
Yet the 40 or so longtime residents who gathered in a West Baltimore church basement on this August night — many of whom were older black women afraid to walk to the store or leave their homes at night — had come to urge police to clear their corners of miscreants and restore order to their crime-plagued community.
“Please, help me,” pleaded gas station owner Chaudhry Masood, whose parking lot has been overrun by loiterers and where a 17-year-old was recently shot and killed. […]
The Aug. 10 report came more than a year after the death of Freddie Gray in police custody. His funeral touched off riots, an unsuccessful prosecution of six police officers and the Justice Department investigation. Many of the abuses that investigators found centered on the way police officers interact with black Baltimoreans, including people congregating on street corners. The report concluded that Baltimore officers had “nearly unfettered discretion to criminalize the act of standing on public sidewalks.” […]
Clearing the corners has been a mainstay of Baltimore policing for decades, a way for a beat cop to show who’s boss and to break up open-air drug markets that once numbered 200 across the city.
Anthony Barksdale, who retired from the force in 2014 as a deputy police commissioner, said he would tell young men, “Fellas, I know you’re going to give my corner,” and they would scatter.
After the Justice Department report, Barksdale said, “Everybody on the corner is challenging the police. Then when the police drive by and don’t push them off, the citizens are saying, ‘What the hell are the cops good for?’ ”
Barksdale took exception to the report’s criticism that stops of pedestrians were concentrated in a few black neighborhoods. Barksdale, who is black and grew up in West Baltimore, said that’s true only because “police are responding to crime.”
The Justice Department, he said, has effectively “turned over control of the corners to the criminal elements. The city is suffering already, and it’s going to suffer more. . . . They need to understand the streets of Baltimore are no joke, and they’ve given the bad elements more authority to destroy the neighborhoods.”
On top of all this, as existing police get sick and tired of an impossible job and go elsewhere, quality recruits to replace them are harder and harder to find. What this eventually leads to is standards being dropped simply to keep the numbers at a sustainable level.
Here’s an example. One of my best friends from high school joined the LAPD and was apparently pretty good at it, having promoted and having been cited by the Department for bravery. He left to continue his career elsewhere after the riots in the early 1990’s, when the L.A. city council forced the existing chief, Daryl Gates to resign and hired Willie Williams to replace him, someone with little actual police experience but the overriding qualification of being black. He turned out to be an extraordinarily inept administrator who politicized the department and cultivated a circle of sycophants and toadies. He was so incompetent and borderline corrupt that eventually the city was forced to buy out his contract and replace him.
A lot of experienced police officers left during this time, and as we now know, recruiting standards were significantly lowered to replace them. The end results of this were things like the Ramparts Police scandal, which resulted in more than 140 civil lawsuits against the city of Los Angeles and cost the city an estimated $125 million in settlements, not to mention the legal fees and administrative costs.
Another thing to reflect on is where this attack on local police forces actually originates from. A leaked document from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation shows the extent of the money involved in financing groups like Black Lives Matter (who also got millions of dollars from the Ford Foundation) with the express idea of undermining local control of police forces and ultimately federalizing them using the Obama Justice department coupled with targeted social unrest.
Soros and others are also spending large amounts of money to see to it that hard Left progressives – like Marilyn Mosby – are elected to key positions as prosecutors and attorneys general in America’s cities.
All that aside, in fairness it needs mentioning that there probably are a lot of the locals who don’t like the police or how they behave. To quote one Fred Price in North St. Louis a year or so ago after the police took out a crackhouse in his neighborhood, killing one of the denizens who pointed a gun at them:
“They provoked the situation,” Price, 33, said. “Situations like this make us want to keep the police out of the neighborhood. They’re shooting first, then asking questions.”
While I might disagree with Mr. Price he has a point. And points the way to a win-win solution, which I presented before when I wrote about this at the time it occurred:
The locals don’t like the police, to put it mildly, and I’m sure that the police themselves don’t enjoy going into neighborhoods where their attempts to do a difficult job are looked upon by a significant number of the inhabitants as the provocation of racist interlopers.
Mr. Fred Price points the way to a win win resolution that will please everyone. Let’s indeed give the residents of north St. Louis and other similar areas a way to keep the police out of their neighborhoods.
Let the residents take a vote on making their neighborhoods off limits to police. If such a vote passes, let the residents make their own arrangements for crime prevention or policing should they see fit to do so,and offer property owners a discount on their taxes based on this city service they would no longer be using.
Police would be limited to enforcing the perimeters of such neighborhoods, so that thugs and criminals would be prevented from leaving these neighborhoods during certain hours. But inside the perimeter, the residents themselves would take responsibility.
Based on certain incidents that have happened in neighborhoods like this in the past during tense times, it would probably make sense to eliminate or at least cut back fire department and EMT service as well, since many times they require a police escort in order to guarantee the safety of the firemen and EMT personnel. Or perhaps these communities might be able to make special arrangements not to attack them.
Like I said, a win win. The inhabitants of these neighborhoods would get the kind of policing they deserve, and the men and women the majorities in these communities see as vicious police killers would have no opportunity to practice their racism. And the police wouldn’t have to go into these areas where they’re seen as the enemy, making life easier and less dangerous for them.
Of course, if the people in these communities voted to continue to allow the police to serve them, it certainly wouldn’t be out of line for the police to demand respect and a healthy benefit of the doubt in exchange.
My bet is that most people who have an actual stake in these communities – a job, a home, families and perhaps a business – would vote for option number two.
Continue reading As The Obama DOJ Handcuffs Them, Many Blacks Beg Cops For Protection
. . . → Read More: As The Obama DOJ Handcuffs Them, Many Blacks Beg Cops For Protection
While I’m depressed about the election and America’s economic future, the news isn’t completely grim. Advocates of personal freedom are winning on the issue of guns. Gun ownership has become more pervasive and legal protections for the Second Amendment have expanded, all of which is very good news for those of us who want a […]
Continue reading Gun Control Lessons for Morons
. . . → Read More: Gun Control Lessons for Morons
I thought it was a remarkable development last year when a columnist from the New York Times reported that supposedly pro-feminist policies actually backfire against women. Maybe this would help readers recognize that there are adverse unintended consequences of government intervention. Bastiat would be very happy! Now we have a new example from the academic […]
Continue reading Academic Research Shows Minorities Get Hurt When Government Tries to Help
. . . → Read More: Academic Research Shows Minorities Get Hurt When Government Tries to Help
Saying that Hillary Clinton will want to change the subject of this article is understatement. Let’s start by saying that articles like this virtually guarantee that she’ll announce her VP pick this afternoon. The bad news for Mrs. Clinton is that this ties into the case that Donald Trump emphasized during last night’s acceptance speech. […]
Continue reading Fraternal Order of Police vs. Hillary
. . . → Read More: Fraternal Order of Police vs. Hillary
Donald Trump’s acceptance speech last night has been characterized as being scary or dark by Democrats. Mo Elleithee, a former Hillary campaign spokesman, said that this was a dreadful week for the GOP. That’s spin but not very good spin. Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s pollster, said that she expects Trump and Hillary to be tied in […]
Continue reading Trump’s triumphant speech
. . . → Read More: Trump’s triumphant speech
The Constitution and Bill of Rights exist to protect our civil liberties from government. And that’s true whether the attack on our rights is legislative or bureaucratic. For instance: Our 1st Amendment rights to participate in the political process are – or at least should be – inviolate, even if some politicians think they can […]
Continue reading Hillary’s Anti-Gun Agenda: An Attack on the Constitution and an Assault on Common Sense
. . . → Read More: Hillary’s Anti-Gun Agenda: An Attack on the Constitution and an Assault on Common Sense
It’s happened again. A nut went to a gun-free zone and engaged in a mass killing. In this example, the perpetrator apparently was an Islamic fanatic upset about gay people. But let’s set aside the question of motive and ask the important question of why politicians and bureaucrats don’t want innocent people to have any […]
Continue reading Another Shooting Tragedy in a Gun-Free Zone
. . . → Read More: Another Shooting Tragedy in a Gun-Free Zone
I recently wrote about gun control, noting how there’s less murder in demographically similar U.S. states than there is in matching Canadian provinces. This is one of the reasons why I’m optimistic about protecting the Second Amendment. The empirical evidence is so strong that law-abiding people are safer in well-armed societies. But let’s see how […]
Continue reading From Ironic to Asinine: Global Gun Control Developments
. . . → Read More: From Ironic to Asinine: Global Gun Control Developments
I wrote this article to highlight how untalented Donald Trump’s spokespeople are. The article also highlighted how dishonest Trump’s allies are. As deceptive as Barry Bennett, Katrina Pierson, David Wohl and Ed Brookover are, though, they’re amateurs compared with Roger Stone. If you’ve been hiding under a rock, Stone is Trump’s thug. He’s Trump’s chief […]
Continue reading Trump’s nightmare continues
. . . → Read More: Trump’s nightmare continues