Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Sessions Confirmed; Nasty Fauxahontas Fails In Bogus Race Card Attempt

Senator Jeff Sessions was confirmed as Attorney General, but not before Fauxahontas, prog-fascist heroine and the senior senator from Massachusetts made a particularly nasty attempt at impugning the reputation of a far more honest and accomplished huma… . . . → Read More: Sessions Confirmed; Nasty Fauxahontas Fails In Bogus Race Card Attempt

It’s OVER. Congress Certifies Trump’s Victory Amid Democrat Protest

Ah, this is absolutely delicious. Today, congress officially certified the electoral college vote and of course, Donald Trump’s amazing victory. What made it even sweeter is that the Democrats in congress had to watch it happen, with one of their own, …

Continue reading It’s OVER. Congress Certifies Trump’s Victory Amid Democrat Protest

. . . → Read More: It’s OVER. Congress Certifies Trump’s Victory Amid Democrat Protest

Whoopsie! Has Chuck Schumer’s Own Racist History Comes Back To Bite Him?

Image result for Chuck Schumer accused of racism

Democrat Minority leader Chuck Schumer has always been one to call Republicans ‘racist.’ He’s done it repeatedly to Donald Trump, tried to paste the label on the late Justice Alito and has promised to attack Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions,the judge who destroyed the Klu Klau Klan in Alabama as a ‘racist’ as well.

As it turns out, it appears Senator Schumer may be  living in a glass house when it comes accusing anyone of  racism. As conservative talk show host Larry Elder relates, we have an eyewitness account of how Chuck Schumer started of his career as a New York State Assemblyman in 1974 by concocted a disgustingly racist scheme to push blacks out of a white neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. He convinced people living in the neighborhood that if they supported him, he would use his clout to defraud the blacks living in the neighborhood and get rid of them.

Here’s the actual article, from 2006, and Senator Schumer has never challenged this or denied it… but wait, there’s more.

Robert Johnson, the billionaire founder of Black Entertainment Television (BET) openly accused Schumer of racism back in 2008. According to Johnson, Schumer openly and blatantly favored “white owned companies” over his own:

Black Entertainment Television founder Robert Johnson, the nation’s first African-American billionaire, made the explosive allegations in a Jan. 17 letter to Schumer, a copy of which was obtained by The Post.

Johnson accused Schumer of trying to get the U.S. Justice Department to derail his efforts to create what he said would be the nation’s first minority-owned airline in more than 30 years.

Johnson’s proposed company, DC Air, would offer discount fairs to many of upstate New York’s economically hard-pressed cities in a partnership arrangement with long-established carrier American Airlines.

“As an African-American businessperson who has a personal net worth significantly greater than the market capitalization of [rival companies] Jet Blue and Air Tran combined, I am offended that you could argue that these two companies deserve an opportunity that should be denied to me,” Johnson told Schumer.

“It cannot be that you believe that they are better businesspersons; perhaps it is because they are white businesspersons.”

Johnson, in an interview with The Post, said, “If Schumer was a Republican and not a Democrat, everyone would be jumping up and down saying, ‘How dare you not support us?’

“I’m trying to figure out what the rationale is for someone who is a member of the liberal Democratic Party to oppose DC Air – when that party has a fundamental commitment to minority ownership and equal opportunities for minorities,” Johnson said.

Asked if he was accusing Schumer of racism, Johnson responded, “If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck and quacks like a duck . . . “

Johnson’s fairly level headed and not known for throwing something like this out there as a habit, so he might very well have hit the nail on the head. Or maybe the other companies just put more money in the Senator’s pocket. After all, Senator Schumer is fairly notorious when it come to having his hand out when it comes to his fundraising.

And get this…according to the Post article, guess who Senator Schumer got to vouch for him? None other than NY Representative Charlie Rangel, one of the most foully corrupt members of congress.

 It figures. And it also makes me wonder what else might be out there.

Quack quack, Senator.

Schumer may or may not be a racist. But what’s obvious is that he’s all about Chuck Schumer,and if displaying racist behavior is needed,(or pretty much anything else) he’s down for it..any means to an end. That’s something to keep in mind as he tries to smear far better men with that label.

If I were Senator Schumer with his background, I’d be a lot more cautious about throwing around bogus accusations of racism. It isn’t nice and can have unforeseen consequences.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Whoopsie! Has Chuck Schumer’s Own Racist History Comes Back To Bite Him?

. . . → Read More: Whoopsie! Has Chuck Schumer’s Own Racist History Comes Back To Bite Him?

Whoopsie! Has Chuck Schumer’s Own Racist History Comes Back To Bite Him?

Image result for Chuck Schumer accused of racism

Democrat Minority leader Chuck Schumer has always been one to call Republicans ‘racist.’ He’s done it repeatedly to Donald Trump, tried to paste the label on the late Justice Alito and has promised to attack Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions,the judge who destroyed the Klu Klau Klan in Alabama as a ‘racist’ as well.

As it turns out, it appears Senator Schumer may be  living in a glass house when it comes accusing anyone of  racism. As conservative talk show host Larry Elder relates, we have an eyewitness account of how Chuck Schumer started of his career as a New York State Assemblyman in 1974 by concocted a disgustingly racist scheme to push blacks out of a white neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. He convinced people living in the neighborhood that if they supported him, he would use his clout to defraud the blacks living in the neighborhood and get rid of them.

Here’s the actual article, from 2006, and Senator Schumer has never challenged this or denied it… but wait, there’s more.

Robert Johnson, the billionaire founder of Black Entertainment Television (BET) openly accused Schumer of racism back in 2008. According to Johnson, Schumer openly and blatantly favored “white owned companies” over his own:

Black Entertainment Television founder Robert Johnson, the nation’s first African-American billionaire, made the explosive allegations in a Jan. 17 letter to Schumer, a copy of which was obtained by The Post.

Johnson accused Schumer of trying to get the U.S. Justice Department to derail his efforts to create what he said would be the nation’s first minority-owned airline in more than 30 years.

Johnson’s proposed company, DC Air, would offer discount fairs to many of upstate New York’s economically hard-pressed cities in a partnership arrangement with long-established carrier American Airlines.

“As an African-American businessperson who has a personal net worth significantly greater than the market capitalization of [rival companies] Jet Blue and Air Tran combined, I am offended that you could argue that these two companies deserve an opportunity that should be denied to me,” Johnson told Schumer.

“It cannot be that you believe that they are better businesspersons; perhaps it is because they are white businesspersons.”

Johnson, in an interview with The Post, said, “If Schumer was a Republican and not a Democrat, everyone would be jumping up and down saying, ‘How dare you not support us?’

“I’m trying to figure out what the rationale is for someone who is a member of the liberal Democratic Party to oppose DC Air – when that party has a fundamental commitment to minority ownership and equal opportunities for minorities,” Johnson said.

Asked if he was accusing Schumer of racism, Johnson responded, “If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck and quacks like a duck . . . “

Johnson’s fairly level headed and not known for throwing something like this out there as a habit, so he might very well have hit the nail on the head. Or maybe the other companies just put more money in the Senator’s pocket. After all, Senator Schumer is fairly notorious when it come to having his hand out when it comes to his fundraising.

And get this…according to the Post article, guess who Senator Schumer got to vouch for him? None other than NY Representative Charlie Rangel, one of the most foully corrupt members of congress.

 It figures. And it also makes me wonder what else might be out there.

Quack quack, Senator.

Schumer may or may not be a racist. But what’s obvious is that he’s all about Chuck Schumer,and if displaying racist behavior is needed,(or pretty much anything else) he’s down for it..any means to an end. That’s something to keep in mind as he tries to smear far better men with that label.

If I were Senator Schumer with his background, I’d be a lot more cautious about throwing around bogus accusations of racism. It isn’t nice and can have unforeseen consequences.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Whoopsie! Has Chuck Schumer’s Own Racist History Comes Back To Bite Him?

. . . → Read More: Whoopsie! Has Chuck Schumer’s Own Racist History Comes Back To Bite Him?

The Electoral Vote Goes Badly – For Hillary

 http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/10/hillary_shocked.jpg

Today, the electors of the Electoral College had their official vote, and one candidate lost electoral votes.

That would be Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, who had 4 of her electors peel off and vote for someone else. In Washington, a state Clinton won, she ended up with only eight of the state’s 12 electoral votes. Colin Powell received three votes and Native American tribal leader Faith Spotted Eagle received one. Two of Donald Trump’s electors, both from Texas peeled off as well,one voting for Ron Paul and another for John Kasich. That gave him a total of 306, far above the 270 he needed. One of them was Christopher Suprun, who now faces prosecution under federal Stolen Valor statutes for claiming he was a 9/11 first responder when he wasn’t anywhere near New York or Washington DC on the day in question. Probably just got confused…again.

There were, of course, protesters inside and outside the state capitol buildings where the votes were cast. After going to the trouble of harassing electors for over a month withe-mails, phone calls, and even death threats, they certainly weren’t going to stop now. Some of the indoor tantrums were hilarious:

The entire clip on NBC News shows the man in the glasses warning her gently, exactly that way you would speak to a child..’now please sit down, or we’ll have to give you a time out.’
When she went nuts, she was removed.

There are other clips of this sort of behavior, but this should suffice.

The part that isn’t hilarious at all is the blatant disrespect for our democracy and the American people who voted for Donald Trump. The psychodrama was fueled by the myth of Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote, something the media keeps rehashing, perhaps in hopes people will eventually think of it as a fact. Actually, neither candidate won the popular vote, because neither got over 50% of it.

More to the point, the majority of Americans outside of the city limits of Los Angeles and New York City elected Trump.

As of November 27, according to The New York Times, Hillary Clinton had 62,391,335 votes from all states. She had 1,969,920 votes from the five counties that make up New York City, and 1,893,770 votes from Los Angeles County, California.

Donald Trump had 61,125,956 votes from all states, including 461,174 votes from the five counties that make up New York City, and 620,285 votes from Los Angeles County.

In other words, Hillary beat Trump 3,863,690 votes to 1,081,459 votes in New York City and Los Angeles.

But Trump beat Hillary by 60,044,497 votes to 58,527,645 votes in the rest of the country outside the borders of New York City and Los Angeles. So Hillary’s margin in the popular vote rests ENTIRELY on her margin in two large cities — neither of which was contested by the Trump campaign.

Arguing that Hillary ‘won’ is like saying that the Cleveland Indians should have won the World Series because they got more runs than the Chicago Cubs.

But wait, it gets better.

Remember Jill Stein’s Hillary Clinton backed recount attempt? Originally, it was ordered in the State of Michigan by U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith, an Obama appointee even though Stein had no standing since there was no way a recount would have affected her. She proceeded to file suit in two other states Trump won, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. And then suddenly, th ewhole scam ground to a halt, with Goldsmith hurriedly reversing himself.

That happened after Trump started gaining votes in all three states…and clear evidence of voter fraud was found in Wayne County affecting over 37% of the precincts in Detroit,which is why Judge Goldsmith was happy to reverse himself and lewt sleeping dogs lie. Similar evidence was found in Wisconsin (Dane County) and Philadelphia, but since recounts were never really started in Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, we have no clue as to how many votes Trump may have actually gotten.

Jill Stein took the $2 million she scammed off this and went home, but there’s also evidence in states Hillary won that Stein never contested. There’s also evidence of voter fraud in Chicago and quite a bit of evidence in Clark County (Las Vegas)Nevada, where most of the staes illegal migrants live. Trump lost Nevada by only 26,434 votes, but we’ll never know if he actually did. Ditto in California, with the highest population of illegal migrants in the U.S., no voter ID laws whatsoever, easily obtained matricula consular cards from the Mexican consulate as the only ID needed to get a driver’s license or register a vehicle and automatic voter registration when you do.

California also rarely if ever purges its voter registration rolls. My mother, a devout Democrat got her usual absentee ballot over a year after she passed away at the house I own she lived in that’s now rented out to tenants. I could very easily have used it to make her vote for Trump if I lacked a heart.

So the whole narrative that ‘Hillary Clinton won the popular vote’ is sheer nonsense. Fake news, if you like.

What isn’t fake is what the Left has planned. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama could have helped unite the country by simply saying what they already knew…that Donald Trump had won the presidency fair and square,  that the American people needed to respect the vote, and that it was time to  put the campaign aside and get behind the new president. Instead, they chose to aid and abet further division and try to deligitimize the election.

Even Bill Clinton has gotten into the act. Today, as an elector for New York State, he cast his vote for Mrs. Clinton but couldn’t avoid saying, “At the end we had the Russians and the FBI deal – she couldn’t prevail against that.”

Of course! It was the Russians who forced Hillary and her minions to violate the Federal Records Act multiple times and commit felonies. It was Putin who made her set up those illegal servers to hide her crooked deals concerning the Clinton Foundation and then delete and bleachbit 32,000 emails that were under congressional subpoena. It was Putin who made Hillary put classified material on her private server and then lie about it to congress. The Russians forced the DNC to send all those e-mails bragging about how they rigged the primaries,fed Hillary debate questions and made all those racist, misogynist and anti-semitic remarks. And it was Putin who made Hillary’s chief aide Huma Abedin put emails concerning State Department business on an unprotected laptop she shared with her pervert husband and lie about it to the FBI. Now, I know Putin is a fairly strong leader but I had no idea he had such magic powers of hypnotism!

 Image result for putin smiling

Vladimir Putin has modestly denied these magical powers,telling President Obama to provide proof that Russia hacked those  emails of shut up. But I’m sure we can believe Bill Clinton,who never lies, right?

Besides, the media is going with that same narrative.

We’ll see what comes next.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading The Electoral Vote Goes Badly – For Hillary

. . . → Read More: The Electoral Vote Goes Badly – For Hillary

An Open Letter To The Democrat Media

https://thehornnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Crying-280x175.jpg

The Democrat -and especially the Democrat media- is still roaring in pain over Donald Trump’s victory and the GOP’s control of congress and the state governments. They still haven’t come to grips with what happened and especially, why.

The latest meme for a lot of them is plotting  what they refer to as ‘new strategies for covering Trump’ (read ‘defeating and marginalizing Trump’) as if this were a tactical problem rather than a transformational change in the making. They’re all about, you know, fighting back by any means necessary. Who gives a rip what those stupid hillbillys in flyover country voted for? We’re the elites, we know best and  this is how we will teach them what to think!

One of the most inadvertently funniest screeds of this nature was written by Jack Shafer, formally of the ultra left Slate and now Politico’s senior media writer.

 http://smexigrex.ru/sites/default/files/pages/110904070328-rs-shafer-media-criticism-00035120-horizontal-gallery.jpg

It’s called ‘The New Rules For Covering Trump’ and was such a viciously superb, clueless sample of where the Leftist Democrat Media is right now that it actually touched my kind and genteel nature. So I wrote the following in the comments section, addressed directly to  Mr. Schafer but something that can certainly be shared by his Lefty friends, because I’m always here to help:


Cute lil’ article..’Here’s how you tame that wild,alpha male chimpanzee.’ I have to wonder how you would have felt and what you would have written if someone referred to Barack Obama like that.

You still don’t get it, do you? Maybe I can help clue you in.

You, CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, the WAPO, the NYT and the rest did exactly what you always do. You threw everything you could at Donald Trump, from ridiculous stories ‘factchecked’ by paid shills working for you and coordinated with the Clinton campaign to the ridiculously biased talking heads the Democrat dominated debate Commission allowed you to you appoint to ‘moderate’ the debates. The only moderator that actually did the job properly without making it a two on one against Trump or Mike Pence was Chris Wallace of FOX, a Democrat but someone who still has a semblance of journalistic ethics. Poor Matt Lauer got banished to the outermost circle of Hell because he actually had the temerity to ask Queen Hillary a question about her illegal private servers and all those e-mails she deleted.. You even went to the trouble of furnishing Hillary with the questions beforehand before the debates. In essence, all of you were part of the Clinton team making what amounted to what the FEC would term a campaign contribution in kind.

 https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/f5/85/14/f58514836229418263d6ff911f10eb1b.jpg


This stuff all worked so well for you before. Did you ever bother to try and figure out why it didn’t work this time? Think about this one, Jack. Did you ever get screwed over? Did anyone you really trusted ever lie to you? Did you ever have a cheating wife or girlfriend, or a car dealership, mechanic, insurance company or other company lie to you and screw you over? Ever trust them again?

Yeah, I know. This was the year you prog-facists were gonna win it big and take over the country once and for all. So you went all out. But you got greedy and that made you stupid and clumsy. You were too blatant this time, too smug, too contemptuous of us peasants and too unapologetic about that contempt. Between that and what Wikileaks put out, every bit of trust and credibility you ever enjoyed was flushed down the toilet except for the terminally credulous. Also, for the first time since Ronaldus Magnus you were facing someone who refused to kiss your behinds, knew how the game was played going in and had the smarts to hire people who knew how to play the game even better than you did. So not only did you lose an election, you got exposed for exactly what you are.

That’s why these cute little tricks you list above won’t work any better than they did during the campaign, Jack. Oh, you’ll still reach the True Believers. MSNBC survived that way for awhile after 2004. But remember, things are different now. More people believed what you were selling back then, didn’t they? And Bush, aside from being no great shakes as a Prez was the kind of guy you could kick at will without him being man enough to hit back and make you look like the propagandists you are. New reality now, Jack. As a recent Nobel Prize winner once wrote. the times,. they are a’changin’. And it’ll be even more evident once Trump actually takes over. Wait’ll one of you publishes classified intel the way Pravda-on-the-Hudson did during Bush’s two terms and see what happens. I guarantee you, it’s not going to be limited to an upset comment or two.

Imagine how much fun it’s going to be if  Trump revokes your press credentials and includes alternate media instead like Breitbart, Drudge and FrontPage. Think how it’s going to be if he gives Julian Assange a pardon and allows him to set up Wikileaks here, and starts giving interviews and access to real journalists like Sharyl Attkisson, and James O’Keefe? Imagine being marginalized.

You made this bed you’re lying in (in more ways than one). There’s an audience for your shtick at least for a while, so you could just keep that going, which I admit amuses me on a personal level. Of course, you could also start being real journalists and work on getting your cred back….oh, never mind. Telling the truth isn’t exactly in your job description, now is it?

Ah well…no hard feelings, here’s a little something to make you feel better…

 Image result for Cartoon media weeps over Trump's victory

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading An Open Letter To The Democrat Media

. . . → Read More: An Open Letter To The Democrat Media

Keith Ellison, The Perfect DNC Head!!

http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/02/keith-ellison-speech.jpg

The Democrats apparently have a new hero who’s heavily favored to take over the Democratic National Committee (DNC) He’s none other than Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN). He’s a leading member of the Progressive Caucus in Congress, a black, a Muslim and a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. I support him totally and hope he gets the job.

His background alone makes him a natural, and I’m glad to see that prominent Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer are supporting his candidacy.

And his background? Simply perfect for the job he wants as the new voice for the entire Democrat party. Let’s look at it, shall we?kei

Keith Ellison was born in 1963 in Detroit and raised Roman Catholic.At age 19, while attending Wayne State University, he converted to Islam. When the Nation of Islam split into the American Society of Muslims (a group modeled on classic Sunni Islam led by Elijah Muhammad’s son Warith Deen Muhammad) and the breakaway reestablished Nation of Islam led by Louis Farrakhan, Ellison went with Farrakhan’s group.

Ellison later attended the University of Minnesota Law School where in his third year, 1989-90, Ellison wrote two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the alias “Keith Hakim.” One column lauded “Minister Louis Farrakhan,” one of America’s premier racists and Jew haters as well as defending the views of a well known Nation of Islam spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad, famous for a vicious speech he made to a Kean College, New Jersey audience that referred to Jews as people whose ancestors were cannibals who “crawled around on all fours in the caves and hills of Europe” and “slept in [their] urination and [their] defecation … for 2,000 years.” He characterized contemporary Jews as “slumlords in the black community” who were busy “sucking our [blacks’] blood on a daily and consistent basis.” He said that Jews had provoked Adolf Hitler when they “went in there, in Germany, the way they do everywhere they go, and they supplanted, they usurped.”

Muhammed, who later went on to form the New Black Panther Party was also a good friend of another Democrat icon, the Rev Al Sharpton. Sharpton was at Muhammed’s bedside when he died in 2001 and paid for Muhammad’s $10,000 funeral.

In his second column, Keith ‘Hakim’ Ellison demanded reparations for black Americans and an all-black, geographically self-contained “homeland.” Two things to keep in mind – Ellison was not some punk kid when he wrote this stuff but a mature young man of 27, and second, as we’ll see, the timeline and his writing doesn’t jibe with his later claim of being involved with the Nation of Islam for only 18 months and being unaware of the racial bigotry and anti-semitism.

In February 1990, Ellison participated in recruiting Kwame Ture (aka Stokely Carmichael) to speak at his law school on the subject, “Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy, or Both?” Ellison certainly can’t say he wasn’t aware of who Ture was or what his views were.

In 1995, Keith Ellison continued his involvement with the Nation of Islam, helping Louis Farrakhan organize the Million Man March, along with another one of Farrakhan’s friends, a young community organizer named Barack Hussein Obama. While newspapers mainly reported only the most general details the alphabet networks only aired a few very carefully edited snippets, I taped the entire thing courtesy of CSPAN. It was one of the worst public exhibitions of racism and outright Jew hatred in recent American history.

Ellison not only participated in this, he appeared onstage with Khalid Abdul Muhammad, who gave the kind of vicious speech you would expect Khalid Abdul Muhammad to give at that kind of gathering. Ellison was there for the whole thing.

In February of 1997 Ellison, who continued to serve as a local NOI spokesman (with the new name of “Keith Ellison-Muhammad”)attended a public hearing concerning Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson, like Ellison a supporter of Louis Farrakhan and the NOI, was under fire for saying to a group meeting held in Temple Israel Synagogue of Minneapolis that she considered Jews “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.”

Ellison of course defended her, saying, “We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to [Ms. Jackson], and by her right to express her views without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite. Minister Farrakhan is a tireless public servant of Black people, who constantly teaches self-reliance and self-examination to the Black community.”

Ellison started his political career   in 1998, when he ran, unsuccessfully, for the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party nomination for state representative as “Keith Ellison-Muhammad.” In an article on his candidacy that appeared in Insight News, Ellison was still touting Farrakhan:

“Anticipating possible criticism for his NOI affiliation, Ellison-Muhammad says he is aware that not everyone appreciates what the Nation does and [he] feels there is a propaganda war being launched against its leader, Minister Louis Farrakhan.”

In February 2000, Ellison gave a speech at a fundraising event sponsored by the Minnesota chapter of a communist front group, the National Lawyers Guild, where he had he previously had served on the steering committee. The event was a fundraiser for Symbionese Liberation Army terrorist Kathleen Soliah after her arrest in St. Paul for the attempted murder of Los Angeles police officers in 1975. Aside from calling for her release, Ellison called her “basically … a black gang member” Ellison also spoke favorably of other high-profile murderers like Mumia Abu Jamal, Assata Shakur, and Geronimo Pratt.

This is the man who ran in 2006 as a Democrat for Minnesota’s Fifth District seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. He’d wised up, dropping the Mohammad from his name and glossing over his Nation of Islam background. When it did finally come up, he proved his fitness for head of the DNC by simply lying about it.

When Jews associated with the local chapter of the Jewish Community Relations Council, questioned his NOI ties, Keith Ellison wrote them a letter stating emphatically that his involvement with the Nation Of Islam only lasted 18 months, that he had no clue about the anti-semitic nature of the group and that he quit as soon as he found out.

As you can tell by the above timeline and history, he was lying in every respect about that, but the gullible Jews bought in and got behind him, and being that its a safe Democrat district, he got in easily.

Now, there’s also a whole other side to Keith Ellison’s background. It involves his connections with Islamist, Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR, the Muslim Public Affairs Committee(MPAC) and the International Institute of Islamic Thought.

And he’s had some interesting backers, among them Nihad Awad (a self-identified supporter of Hamas who would have been jailed for material aid to terrorism if not for Obama’s protection), who spoke at an August 25, 2006 fundraiser for Ellison. The likely head of the DNC accepted thousands of dollars in campaign donations raised by Awad.

And he also spoke at CAIR-Tampa’s sixth annual banquet, where he urged his listeners to support Sami al-Arian, the former University of South Florida professor who had confessed two years earlier to material support for terrorism in raising money and performing other services for the Iran backed terrorist group Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

And there’s Ellison commenting on America’s military response to 9/11 in a July 2007 speech by comparing comparing it to how the Nazis had exploited the 1933 burning of the Reichstag in Berlin: “It’s almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that. After the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the leader [Hitler] of that country in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted.”

How’s that for combining conspiracy theory, calling Republicans Nazis and supine appeasement in one short paragraph? He’s brilliant, I tell you.

He’s also a radical eat-the-rich advocate who admitted in a February 2013 interview with Fox News’ Stuart Varney that he thinks it is “fair” for the wealthy to be taxed at whatever rate is necessary to raise money for the provision of services to more deserving lower-income Americans.

There’s a lot more, but Keith Ellison’s qualifications to be DNC head are clear. Let’s sum them up.

Ellison has continued to be close to CAIR and other Islamist organizations. He’s a J-Street darling and a reliable anti-Israel vote in Congress. He’s a far left uber progressive, and he’s a member of two, get it two Democrat grievance groups, a Muslim and black. And to top it all off, he shown a proven ability to lie convincingly to Jews about his racist, anti-semitic associations! He’s PERFECT and embodies the Democrat party’s policies and new direction. He’s exactly the right guy to head the DNC, and I congratulate them on their choice.

Image result for dhimmicrat

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Keith Ellison, The Perfect DNC Head!!

. . . → Read More: Keith Ellison, The Perfect DNC Head!!

Behind The Smoke And Mirrors -The New Clinton Email Scandal Explained October 31, 2016 JoshuaPundit Politics 0 FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive! “ – Sir Walter Scott The latest bombshell to hit this already explosive campaign season is an announcement by FBI director James Comey that the FBI has opened up a new investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal…and that Clinton’s special assistant Huma Abedin and her ‘husband’ Anthony Weiner are involved. As usual with Clinton Inc., this is a really tangled web, so let’s examine what’s going on, and of course, what it means. (read more) Share this: Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window) Related The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of The FBI Report on Hillary’s Email ScandalSeptember 13, 2016In “Hillary Clinton” It Won’t End Until Hillary DoesOctober 30, 2016In “Hillary Clinton” The Council Has Spoken! Our Watcher’s Council ResultsJuly 8, 2016In “The Council Has Spoken!” #hillaryLied question-marksPrevious Forum: Is The Conservative Movement Dead? Related Articles donald-trump-hillary-clinton-screenshots-hofstra-university-presidential-debate-collage_fotor-compressed Debate Number Three – A Clear Choice 27aca0786f4fb821ca9062b8e5b63c76387272399bbdd8fb49ad78bb874aae9e Hillary Allows Kids To Ask Her Questions — At $2,700 apiece! b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8e Using Trump’s 12 Year Old Tape Shows The Contempt Hillary And Her Media Have For Us Be the first to comment Leave a Reply Logged in as JoshuaPundit. Log out? Comment CommentLuv badge Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Most Recent Posts b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8eBehind The Smoke And Mirrors -The New Clinton Email Scandal Explained

 https://news-images.vice.com/images/articles/meta/2015/10/01/hillary-clinton-was-angry-about-state-department-scrapping-mother-and-father-from-us-passport-applications-1443721956.jpg?crop=1xw:0.6307692307692307xh;0xw,0.009230769230769232xh&resize=1200:*&output-format=image/jpeg&output-quality=75

“Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive! “ – Sir Walter Scott

The latest bombshell to hit this already explosive campaign season is an announcement by FBI director James Comey that the FBI has opened up a new investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal…and that Clinton’s special assistant Huma Abedin and her ‘husband’ Anthony Weiner are involved.

As usual with Clinton Inc., this is a really tangled web, so let’s examine what’s going on, and of course, what it means.

First, let’s quickly review:

As you know, Hillary Clinton went through what passed for an investigation into the felonies she committed as Secretary of State with her illegal, unprotected private servers and her careless handling of classified materials in violation of the Official Records Act. She has said repeatedly that she told the FBI that she had turned over all her e-mails. We certainly don’t know if she actually did, because she deleted 32,000 of them without turning them over and than used a software called Bleachbit to destroy any possibility of recovering them. Since the FBI didn’t even record her interview or make a transcript, that’s where that stands.

Moreover, the FBI gave Clinton aide Cheryl Mills immunity while allowing her attorney client privilege (unheard of in these circumstances where someone being interviewed is a possible target) in exchange for her turning over her laptop…which they destroyed even though it had been subpoenaed by congress as evidence.

Basically the fix was in and Bill Clinton’s little 45 minute meeting with AG Loretta Lynch aboard her private plane – just by chance, of course – was obviously to work out the details and and reaffirm Mrs. Clinton wasn’t going to be charged because the Obama Department of Justice would tell FBI Director James Comey they weren’t going to prosecute. And as the Wall Street Journal reveals, that Lynch and her DOJ goons would make sure there wasn’t going to be any investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

So one day later, having gotten his orders from Lynch and the DOJ, Comey went to the unusual extent of calling a press conference, went over all the reasons Hillary Clinton should have been charged and then finessed it by saying that he would recommend no charges be filed.

While that caused a firestorm at the time in many quarters, Democrats acted as though Comey deserved the Medal of Honor. They lauded his ethics, praised him to the hilt and the Media rejoiced.

Then last week, FBI Director Comey suddenly announced that the FBI was opening a new investigation on the Clinton e-mails.

You see, Clinton shadow Huma Abedin has told the FBI that she had turned over all of her e-mails and all of her devices. Apparently she didn’t, and a new batch of 650,000 emails were found on a laptop belonging to – wait for it – Abedin’s hubby, none other than the infamous Anthony Weiner!

 

Here’s the New York Times bewailing the sad news but unable to avoid reporting it, because everyone else was:

Federal law enforcement officials said Friday that the new emails uncovered in the closed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server were discovered after the F.B.I. seized electronic devices belonging to Huma Abedin, a top aide to Mrs. Clinton, and her husband, Anthony Weiner.

The F.B.I. is investigating illicit text messages that Mr. Weiner sent to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina. The bureau told Congress on Friday that it had uncovered new emails related to the Clinton case — one federal official said they numbered in the thousands — potentially reigniting an issue that has weighed on the presidential campaign and offering a lifeline to Donald J. Trump less than two weeks before the election.

Comey’s letter to Chaffetz said:

“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation … I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.”

Aiyeee! I have a feeling that Weiner, with nothing left to lose told the FBI what he had and cut a deal.

Of course, no sooner had Comey announced this then he went from being a Democrat hero to someone who was a law breaker, who was ‘endangering the election process,’ ‘unethical.’ and a disgrace. Apparently, Comey announced this even though he was ordered not to by the Obama department of Justice and Loretta Lynch.

I have to admit to a nasty laugh or three as I watch the same people who applauded Comey when he interfered in an election by getting Clinton off the hook now want him burnt at the stake:

 Trey Gowdy a distinguished ex-prosecutor is entirely correct, of course. Hillary Clinton made the decisions that led to this state of affairs, and for her or her creatures to blame anyone else is just ridiculous, just an attempt at the old shell game to get people’s attention diverted.

http://www.teaparty911.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/fed-chair-yellen-shell-game.jpg

So why did Comey do this? And why now?

Since the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails and the Clinton Foundation were deliberately stonewalled and set aside by the Obama Justice Department , there’s been a major morale problem at the Bureau according to various sources. Comey understandably had lost the respect of many of the agents, there are quite a few resignation letters on his desk and it’s at the point where, reportedly, a number of people won’t even return his greetings and limit their interaction with him as much as possible. Reportedly, even his wife was disappointed in him and kept urging him to admit he was wrong when he said Hillary shouldn’t be charged.

This was perhaps a way of trying to recover a little self respect and mollify folks he works with by actually pursuing an investigation. Certainly he’s not doing it to win friends and influence people having alienated most of DC.

Another reason is that having seen the reeking criminality of the Clintons up close, he might actually have had some pang of conscience over what her becoming president might actually mean for America. People who work in law and law enforcement have, typically, an inordinate respect for the law, what it means, how it works and what it does. The idea of seeing an unrepentant criminal like Hillary Clinton become president might have been just too much for James Comey to stomach.

So what effect is all this going to have? What’s likely to happen?

In spite of what the media is saying, Hillary Clinton’s huge drop in the polls was already a fact before this came out. Like James Comey, apparently a lot of people are doing some serious thinking about whether they really want Hillary Clinton in the White House with all that entails. This latest revelation won’t help, of course, but the Wikileaks releases, Mrs. Clinton’s conduct during the campaign, total disgust at the ridiculously partisan media and a desire for real change have all had an effect. This last item just cements what was already apparent.

Comey could be fired by President Obama, but at this point that might almost be a relief for him. Like Anthony Weiner,James Comey has nothing left to lose. It would also give even more credence to Mrs. Clinton’s having a lot to hide if it appeared he were being punished merely for doing his job. The metrics wouldn’t look good. But don’t be surprised if Comey ‘resigns’ after the election during Obama’s lame duck period..an dif I were him, I would seriously watch my six. These are ruthless and very vindictive people he’s dealing with here.

That said, don’t expect anything serious to come of this. It’s already a known fact that President Obama lied openly about not knowing about Mrs. Clinton’s illegal e-mail setup and even sent her e-mails on it, which is exactly why he invoked executive privilege on any emails using the alias he created. But if Mrs. Clinton looks like she’s going to be convicted of anything, she knows where a lot of bodies are buried, can cut a deal and implicate him.

If he’s elected, President Trump might very well decide to walk back his pledge to investigate Hillary completely since he has to know where that’s going to end up leading. While both these vampires rate a stake in the heart, perhaps just getting them off America’s neck and concentrating on fixing the massive damage they did might be more constructive than putting them in orange jump suits as guests of the Federal government, as justified as that would be.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Behind The Smoke And Mirrors -The New Clinton Email Scandal Explained October 31, 2016 JoshuaPundit Politics 0 FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive! “ – Sir Walter Scott The latest bombshell to hit this already explosive campaign season is an announcement by FBI director James Comey that the FBI has opened up a new investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal…and that Clinton’s special assistant Huma Abedin and her ‘husband’ Anthony Weiner are involved. As usual with Clinton Inc., this is a really tangled web, so let’s examine what’s going on, and of course, what it means. (read more) Share this: Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window) Related The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of The FBI Report on Hillary’s Email ScandalSeptember 13, 2016In “Hillary Clinton” It Won’t End Until Hillary DoesOctober 30, 2016In “Hillary Clinton” The Council Has Spoken! Our Watcher’s Council ResultsJuly 8, 2016In “The Council Has Spoken!” #hillaryLied question-marksPrevious Forum: Is The Conservative Movement Dead? Related Articles donald-trump-hillary-clinton-screenshots-hofstra-university-presidential-debate-collage_fotor-compressed Debate Number Three – A Clear Choice 27aca0786f4fb821ca9062b8e5b63c76387272399bbdd8fb49ad78bb874aae9e Hillary Allows Kids To Ask Her Questions — At $2,700 apiece! b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8e Using Trump’s 12 Year Old Tape Shows The Contempt Hillary And Her Media Have For Us Be the first to comment Leave a Reply Logged in as JoshuaPundit. Log out? Comment CommentLuv badge Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Most Recent Posts b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8eBehind The Smoke And Mirrors -The New Clinton Email Scandal Explained

. . . → Read More: Behind The Smoke And Mirrors -The New Clinton Email Scandal Explained October 31, 2016 JoshuaPundit Politics 0 FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive! “ – Sir Walter Scott The latest bombshell to hit this already explosive campaign season is an announcement by FBI director James Comey that the FBI has opened up a new investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal…and that Clinton’s special assistant Huma Abedin and her ‘husband’ Anthony Weiner are involved. As usual with Clinton Inc., this is a really tangled web, so let’s examine what’s going on, and of course, what it means. (read more) Share this: Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window) Related The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of The FBI Report on Hillary’s Email ScandalSeptember 13, 2016In “Hillary Clinton” It Won’t End Until Hillary DoesOctober 30, 2016In “Hillary Clinton” The Council Has Spoken! Our Watcher’s Council ResultsJuly 8, 2016In “The Council Has Spoken!” #hillaryLied question-marksPrevious Forum: Is The Conservative Movement Dead? Related Articles donald-trump-hillary-clinton-screenshots-hofstra-university-presidential-debate-collage_fotor-compressed Debate Number Three – A Clear Choice 27aca0786f4fb821ca9062b8e5b63c76387272399bbdd8fb49ad78bb874aae9e Hillary Allows Kids To Ask Her Questions — At $2,700 apiece! b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8e Using Trump’s 12 Year Old Tape Shows The Contempt Hillary And Her Media Have For Us Be the first to comment Leave a Reply Logged in as JoshuaPundit. Log out? Comment CommentLuv badge Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Most Recent Posts b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8eBehind The Smoke And Mirrors -The New Clinton Email Scandal Explained

“Don’t Look At WikiLeaks, Fellow Jackasses! Keep Those Blinders on!”

With these constant WikiLeaks disclosures of racist and anti-Gay slurs, sexism, outright lies, cronyism and crooked dealings, the Democrats have a major problem with keeping the troop’s morale up as more and more comes out.So interim DNC chief Donna Br…

Continue reading “Don’t Look At WikiLeaks, Fellow Jackasses! Keep Those Blinders on!”

. . . → Read More: “Don’t Look At WikiLeaks, Fellow Jackasses! Keep Those Blinders on!”

WIKILeaks : Top Dem Donors Awarded Ambassadorships, Federal Posts

Pay to Play indeed! WikiLeaks Strikes again.Aside from ambassadorships to strategic foreign countries given to people who knew nothing about them, key federal posts like assistant attorney general and FTC chairman were put up for auction to the highest… . . . → Read More: WIKILeaks : Top Dem Donors Awarded Ambassadorships, Federal Posts

Tim Kaine: Muslim Brotherhood Ties, Communist Groupie, And Grifter

Presumptive Democratic candidate for president Hillary Clinton with her choice for vice-president Tim Kaine.

Now that there’s a fair amount of noise about Mrs. Clinton being forced to drop out of the race (remember just a short time ago when her campaign was threatening the media not to make an issue out of her health?)there’s been some speculation about Tim Kaine, her running mate taking over the top slot.

He’s escaped much scrutiny thus far, so let’s take a look at him, shall we? it isn’t a pretty sight, believe me.

First of all, when you do some research, you find out that Kaine was quite the Sandisita groupie at one time and has publicly never regretted it. The reverse, in fact.

Even Pravda on the Hudson presented a sanitized version of Kaine’s
life transforming “mission” trip to Latin America in 1980. What this story leaves out, of course, is Kaine’s wholesale embrace of the Sandinistas and radical ‘liberation theology’, something even Pope Francis has disavowed.

What it was, of course, was a Soviet disinformation plan to use radical elements to infiltrate the Catholic Church and bring Catholic Latin American countries under the Soviet thumb. The highest ranking Soviet defector, General Ion Pacepa has openly admitted that he participated in this.

Liberation theology became a big deal among certain Jesuits, some of whom were actually expelled from Latin American countries after being arrested for fomenting communist revolution and for gunrunning. This happened while Kaine was on his mission, and one extremely radical American-born Jesuit who was actually expelled from the order was Father Jim Carney. That’s the priest Pravda-on-the-Hudson tells us Kaine sought out as his mentor, without, of course, much info on who Father Carney actually was.

Carney was a full-blown communist apparatchnik. In 1983, Carney was part of a 96-man unit that invaded Honduras to violently export the Sandanista Communist ‘revolution’* there too, using Cuban and Nicaraguan trained guerillas led by Jose Reyes Mata, one of the murderous Che Guevara’s officers n Bolivia.

Honduran troops fortunately intercepted the communist guerrillas,and Reyes Mata was captured and killed, along with Carney. Kaine wrote publicly at that time, blaming America his death. The idea of the Sandinistas brutalizing and enslaving the Honduran people as they had in Nicaragua didn’t bother him one bit. He was, as they say, a true believer.

And he still is. Today, his mentor in Liberation theology is someone who most people consider Carney’s successor, Father Melo, who favors Soviet-style collectivism and land distribution.

Then, there’s Tim Kaine’s Muslim Brotherhood ties.

As governor of Virginia, Kaine appointed a Hamas supporter to a state immigration commission, spoke at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terrorist suspect and took donations from well-known Islamist groups.

In 2007, Governor Kaine appointed Dr. Esam Omeish, the president of the Muslim American Society (MAS), one of the Muslim Brotherhood’s front groups here in America.

Omeish also served for two years on the national board of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which the Justice Department also labeled as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, which was basically a money laundering scam for Hamas. Omeish would be in jail if it wasn’t for President Obama and former attorney general Eric Holder.

Kaine was forced to fire him, but only after heavy pressure from Virginia delegates and the press when online videos of Omeish surfacede showing him accusing Israel of genocide against Palestinians and exhorting Muslims to “the jihad way.”

This is by no means Kaine’s only tie to Islamists. In September 2011, Kaine spoke at a “Candidates Night” dinner organized by the New Dominion PAC that presented a Lifetime Achievement Award for Jamal Barzinji, a prominent figure in America’s Muslim Brotherhood who almost was prosecuted for material aid to terrorism until the Obama Administration let him off the hook like Omeish and the other Islamists.

Barzinji has played a major role in nearly every Brotherhood front in the U.S. and was vice president of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), which is a name my readers might recognize. Barzinji’s group was closely allied to Palestinian Islamic Jihad operative Sami Al-Arian who was convicted by the Bush Administration under the RICO statutes for conspiracy to commit aid to terrorism among other things.

Barzinji’s IIIT also donated money to Kaine’s campaign, giving him $10,000 in 2011 via the New Dominion PAC, the organization that held the event honoring Barzinji that Kaine spoke at. The Barzinji-tied New Dominion PAC also donated $43,050 to Kaine’s gubernatorial campaign.

This  PAC has very strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Democratic Party in Virginia,  and gave Kaine and others almost $257,000 in donations. Barzinji’s grandson served in Governor McAuliffe’s administration before becoming the Obama Administration’s liaison to the Muslim-American community.

 Another $4,300 donated to Kaine’s Senate campaign in 2011-2012 came from officials of the aforementioned Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Another $3,500 came from Hisham Al-Talib, a leader from Barzinji’s IIIT organization.

This likely explains why Tim Kaine was a leader in trying to dis-invite Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu from speaking to a joint session of Congress in March of 2015 and boycotted the speech like a lot of other Democrats when he was unsuccessful. it’s about what you can expect when a politician cheerfully takes money from Islamist groups and appoints a Hamas ally to a high state position.

Finally, we get to Tim Kaine’s real qualification as Hillary’s Mini-Me, his appetite for using his position to feather his nest.

As Lieutenant Governor and Governor, Kaine reportedly “took advantage of the state’s lax gift laws to receive,” among other things, “an $18,000 Caribbean vacation, $5,500 in clothes and a trip to watch George Mason University play in the NCAA basketball Final Four during his years as lieutenant governor and governor.” The report found that Kaine “reported more than $160,000 in gifts from 2001 to 2009, mostly for travel to and from political events and conferences.”

This is the same sort of thing Republican governor Bob McDonnell was indicted form but Kaine apparently was able to use his connections to skate on.

So now you know a lot about who Tim Kaine is. It’s easy to see why Clinton picked him…but the political rationale, that he can carry Virginia for her is something he may not be able to swing. He’ snot particularly well thought of in a lot of circlres there, even with Northern Virginia loaded with fellow Democrat feeders at the Obama Administration’s trough in DC.

I’ll finish up by saying that there’s very little chance of Mrs. Clinton dropping out of the race if she’s still breathing. Her presidency has already been sold at lucrative prices to numerous donors foreign and domestic who expect favorable treatment on the come for their Clinton Foundation donations, speaking gigs for her disreputable husband and campaign contributions.

If she loses, that’s one thing. It’s an investment that didn’t come off. But if she drops out, they’re going to be knocking on the Clinton’s door wanting their money back and the interaction is going to get extremely unpleasant when they find out she can’t give the money back, either because it’s already been spent or because it’s locked up in the Foundation.

* The Sandinistas were founded by KGB operative Carlos Fonseca

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Tim Kaine: Muslim Brotherhood Ties, Communist Groupie, And Grifter

. . . → Read More: Tim Kaine: Muslim Brotherhood Ties, Communist Groupie, And Grifter

Obama’s CIA Head Lies, Endorses Clinton, Shows How Trump Will Be Attacked At Debates

 

Mike Morrell, President Obama’s handpicked choice to head the CIA in 2011 and again from 2012-2013 is a lifelong Democrat in spite of his claim to be ‘non-partisan’. Today, he endorsed Hillary Clinton for president and called her “highly qualified.” He claims during the four years he worked with her, he found her -don’t laugh-  to be “prepared, detail-oriented, thoughtful, inquisitive and willing to change her mind if presented with a compelling argument.”

Donald Trump? “Dangerous to America’s national security, unprepared and an unwitting Russian Agent.”

Morrell put this out in an editorial in Pravda-on-the -Hudson, and then hit the Sunday shows, most notably with Martha Raddatz on the Clinton News Network (CNN).

This is actually a very telling endorsement. Here we have the man who was Obama’s pick as head of the CIA who backs Mrs. Clinton’s claim that Benghazi was ‘about the video’ and  oversaw the intel in Obama and Hillary’s illegal Libya war which helped destabilize the entire Middle East and led to deaths in Libya, Syria, Algeria, Mali and Nigeria (yes, Boko Haram got a lot of Khaddaffi’s arms too). This is the man who was in command of the agency that trained the Syrian Free Army members who later became ISIS, like these guys and many more just like them. While the article talks about this being a State Department program, the agency that did the hands on work was the CIA, in connivance with Qatar, Turkey and the Saudis as PBS revealed. And it that isn’t enough to call Morrell’s judgment into question, he’s also willing to disregard Mrs. Clinton’s trafficking of confidential material for ca$h.

Just to show you how bogus this all is, on the one hand, Morrell claims that while he hasn’t seen any evidence, he’s ‘pretty sure’ Russia was behind the DNC hacking. Yet, he’s willing to ignore (and Martha Raddatz, of course would never mention) that if  he’s  right about Russia being responsible,, Putin has tons of blackmail material ready and waiting  if the  corrupt candidate  he’s  shilling for, Hillary Clinton, becomes president.

Speaking of Russia, Morrell also conveniently forgets that Mrs.  Clinton, under Obama’s direction was responsible for giving Putin top secret intel on our Missile defense system as part of the ‘reset,’ In particular our state of the art Hit-to-Kill technology. And that wasn’t ‘unknowing’, but deliberate. Talk about a risk to national security!

On the other hand, Morrell’s ‘evidence’ that Trump is ‘an unwitting Russian agent’ is that the two men have spoken respectfully about each other, with Trump saying that Putin is a much stronger leader than Obama, something that’s undoubtedly true from the perspective of looking after his country’s interests.

None of this is accidental,by the way. In the NBC commander-in -chief forum, Trump came across strongly as a strategic thinker and presidential to the overwhelming majority of viewers  while Mrs. Clinton was revealed  as the corrupt, incompetent and dishonest creature she actually is in spite of Matt Lauer’s best efforts.

Again, since the Democrats can’t sell Hillary, their only recourse is to demonize Donald Trump and hope enough of it sticks thanks to constant repetition on the media they control.

The choice of Martha Raddatz for Morrell’s interview is no coincidence. She’ll be ‘moderating’ the 2nd presidential debate and rest assured, this will be her attack line, to ignore Clinton’s serious foreign policy errors and national security breaches and concentrate on ‘Trump, the Russian agent.’

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Obama’s CIA Head Lies, Endorses Clinton, Shows How Trump Will Be Attacked At Debates

. . . → Read More: Obama’s CIA Head Lies, Endorses Clinton, Shows How Trump Will Be Attacked At Debates

A Few Things About Sacrifice, Politics And A Certain Mr.Khan..

 

The latest Trump molehill pumped up by the media to obscure the Clinton mountains involves one of the speakers the Democrats had at their convention, Khizr Khan and his wife, to attack Donald Trump, a Pakistani Muslim couple who lost their unfortunately lost their son, a decorated vet, in Iraq in 2004.

The talking point of Mr. Khan’s speech was,of course Donald Trump’s ‘racism’ in wanting to ‘ban all Muslims from America.’ Of course, all Trump has proposed is extreme vetting on immigrants from certain countries ad a temporary ban until we figure out policy, but hey, why go with the truth when a lie works so well and the media will cover for you? Just ask Hillary Clinton!

Mr. Kahn claimed that ‘if Donald Trump were president my son would never have come to America’ which given some facts we’ll look at later, might or might not have been true. And he invited Donald Trump to ‘read the Constitution. If he doesn’t have one, I will lend him my copy.’

Actually there’s nothing in the Constitution that prohibits America from refusing anyone entry for any reason. And the sensible precautions Donald Trump is proposing make far more sense to me then our current policies of amnesty for unvetted Muslims from ISIS infested areas and lying about it to the American people.

Now, I have nothing personal against the Khans and I feel for their loss, but you know, it would have been far more moving if the Clinton campaign had one of the four Benghazi mothers speak at their convention. Oh, wait…

I think Trump should have ignored Khan’s attack on him…after all it’s Dem politics as usual. But he unfortunately stuck his foot in it. Someone really needs to vet his tweets before they go out, so they aren’t deliberately misconstrued by the media. And he also needs to stay out of silly twitter wars back and forth, and avoid interviews with hardliners owned by the Clintons masquerading as ‘journalists’ and ‘newsmen’ like George Stephanopoulos.

But given that (we’ll pretend he’s Mrs. Clinton for an instant and ignore the silly ‘sacrifices’ brouhahah), much of what he said was true.

For instance, it’s perfectly true that Hillary’s votes and later conduct,particularly the games she, Joe Biden, a certain Senator Obama and Harry Reid played with funding that cost the lives of our troops (see former Sec Def Bob Gates’ book for details. He’s pretty open about it) as well as the Obama Administration’s policies helped send the Khan’s son to his death in 2004 along with a lot of others and made their sacrifices in vain.

It’s also true that as Trump tweeted, “This story is not about Mr. Khan, who is all over the place doing interviews, but rather RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM and the U.S. Get smart!”

In that context, Mr. Kahn’s remarks on how terrorism has nothing to do with Islam also raise some questions in my mind. The Qu’ran, the Hadiths, the Sunna and certain recent events say something very different.

And here’s another interesting fact. Khizr Kahn has some very interesting connections with the Clinton crime Foundation and the Saudi government.

As Michael Walsh points out:

Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.

Khan and his wife Ghazala Khan both appeared on stage at the Democratic National Convention to attack, on Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s behalf, Donald Trump—the Republican nominee for president. Their son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, was killed in Iraq in 2004. Khizr Khan, in his speech to the DNC, lambasted Donald Trump for wanting to temporarily halt Islamic migration to America from countries with a proven history of exporting terrorists.

Since then, Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos—who served as a senior adviser to the president in Bill Clinton’s White House and is a Clinton Foundation donor as well as a host on the ABC network—pushed Trump on the matter in an interview. Trump’s comments in that interview have sparked the same mini-rebellion inside his party, in the media and across the aisle that has happened many times before. The usual suspects inside the GOP, from former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to House Speaker Paul Ryan to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to Ohio Gov. John Kasich, have condemned Trump in one way or another. The media condemnation has been swift and Democrats, as well their friends throughout media, are driving the train as fast as they can.

But until now, it looked like the Khans were just Gold Star parents who the big bad Donald Trump attacked. It turns out, however, in addition to being Gold Star parents, the Khans are financially and legally tied deeply to the industry of Muslim migration–and to the government of Saudi Arabia and to the Clintons themselves.

Khan, according to Intelius as also reported by Walid Shoebat, used to work at the law firm Hogan Lovells, LLP, a major D.C. law firm that has been on retainer as the law firm representing the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States for years. Citing federal government disclosure forms, the Washington Free Beacon reported the connection between Saudi Arabia and Hogan Lovells a couple weeks ago.
“Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show,” Joe Schoffstall of the Free Beacon reported.

The federal form filed with the Department of Justice is a requirement under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, which makes lobbyists and lawyers working on behalf of foreign governments and other agents from abroad with interests in the United States register with the federal government.

The government of Saudi Arabia, of course, has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation.
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million,” Schoffstall wrote.

Trump, of course, has called on Hillary Clinton to have the Clinton Foundation return the money.

“Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave vast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays,” Trump wrote in a Facebook post back in June, according to Politico. “Hillary must return all money from such countries!”

“Crooked Hillary says we must call on Saudi Arabia and other countries to stop funding hate,” Trump posted in a separate Facebook posting at the time. “I am calling on her to immediately return the $25 million plus she got from them for the Clinton Foundation!”

Of course, to this day, Hillary Clinton and her Clinton Foundation has kept the money from the Saudi Arabian government. {…}


Khan’s connections with the Hogan Lovells firm run deep, according to a report from Law.com written by Katelyn Polantz.

 “Khan spent seven years, from 2000 to 2007, in the Washington, D.C., office of then-Hogan & Hartson,” Polantz wrote. “He served as the firm’s manager of litigation technology. Although he did not practice law while at Hogan, Khan was well versed in understanding the American courts system.
[…]

But representing the Clinton Foundation backing Saudi Arabian government and having one of its lobbyists bundle $50,000-plus for Clinton’s campaign are hardly the only places where the Khan-connected Hogan Lovells D.C. mega-firm brush elbows with Clinton Cash. 

The firm also handles Hillary Clinton’s taxes and is deeply connected with the email scandal whereby when she was Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton set up a home-brew email server system that jeopardized classified information handling and was “extremely careless” according to FBI director James Comey.
“A lawyer at Hogan & Hartson [Howard Topaz] has been Bill and Hillary Clinton’s go-to guy for tax advice since 2004, according to documents released Friday by Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” The American Lawyer’s Nate Raymond wrote in 2008, as Hillary Clinton ran for president that year. “The Clintons’ tax returns for 2000-07 show combined earnings of $109 million, on which they paid $33 million in taxes. New York-based tax partner Howard Topaz has a broad tax practice, and also regularly advises corporations on M&A and executive compensation.”

Breitbart News’ Patrick Howley, in a deep investigative piece on Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, late last year uncovered how Topaz’s firm—which employed Khan while Topaz did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—is also connected to the email scandal.
 Topaz was a partner at Hogan & Hartson, which later merged to become known as Hogan Lovells, where Topaz continues to practice. The firm’s lawyers were major donors to Hillary Clinton’s first presidential campaign,” Howley wrote.
 
For her private email system, Clinton used a spam filtering program MX Logic.

“Hogan & Hartson handled the patent for MX Logic’s email-filtering program, which McAfee bought the small company for $140 million in 2009 in order to acquire,” Howley wrote. “The MX Logic company’s application for a trademark for its SPAMTRAQ program was filed in 2004 on Hogan & Hartson stationery and signed by a Hogan & Hartson attorney. Hogan & Hartson has been responsible for MX Logic annual reports. The email company’s Clinton links present more evidence that Clinton’s political and legal establishment was monitoring her private email use.”

If that all isn’t enough, that same Hogan & Hartson law firm—now Hogan Lovells—employed Loretta Lynch, the current Attorney General of the United States. Lynch infamously just a few weeks ago met with Bill Clinton, Hillary’s husband and the former president, on her private jet in Phoenix just before clearing Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing when it came to her illicit private email server system.


Khan’s own website for his own personal law firm KM Khan Law Office shows he represents clients in the business of buying visas to enter the United States. One of his specific areas of practice, according to the website, is “E2 Treaty Investors, EB5 Investments & Related Immigration Services.” Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the U.S. Senate’s Judiciary Committee, has detailed how the EB5 immigration program is “riddled with flaws and corruption.”

“Maybe it is only here on Capitol Hill—on this island surrounded by reality—that we can choose to plug our ears and refuse to listen to commonly accepted facts,” Grassley said in a statement earlier this year. “The Government Accountability Office, the media, industry experts, members of congress, and federal agency officials, have concurred that the program is a serious problem with serious vulnerabilities. Allow me to mention a few of the flaws.”
Those flaws are enormous (much more here) but this certainly does shed a little light on the matter, no? It certainly seems likes the real reason Khizr Khan was so outspoken against Donald Trump has to do with the fact that he largely makes his living via  unvetted Muslim migration through a leaky visa for sale loophole.
And just as an aside, Mr. Khan, when he’s not brandishing the Constitution for the cameras apparently has a real fetish for the very unconstitutional sharia law! That, along with the above facts does seem to cast some real doubt on the sincerity of what he had to say.

Finally, I have to ask, how much, really, did this have to do with his son? As painful as the loss was and as heroic as is son likely was, why cheapen that for the sake of partisan politics? And why put his wife through that? If she really was as ill as they say, with high blood pressure, this could have easily brought on a stroke. Was it worth the risk just to help get Hillary elected?

In the end, what we have here, once again, is the Democrat media pouncing on Trump’s admittedly clumsy phrasing while ignoring the back story, as well as the serial lies, corruption and malfeasance of their chosen candidate, Hillary Clinton.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading A Few Things About Sacrifice, Politics And A Certain Mr.Khan..

. . . → Read More: A Few Things About Sacrifice, Politics And A Certain Mr.Khan..

A Little Theme Music For Hillary

Truth in labeling, y’know. Exactly what they should play before her acceptance speech…http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif Continue reading A Little Theme Music For Hillary . . . → Read More: A Little Theme Music For Hillary

Dumb Debbie, The DNC And The Wrath Of The Bernistas

Only MSNBC would headline this stuff as ‘cheers.’

San Fran Nan gets her corrupt behind booed offstage!

There’s a real poetic justice in seeing the Democrats, who have so often orchestrated violent chaos as a political tool eat a huge meal of it themselves. Especially when it was the Republican convention in Cleveland that was supposed to be the scene of mass riots and protests.

Bernie Sanders tepidly endorsing Hillary Clinton was bad enough as far as his followers were concerned. Now that the Wikileaks emails have surfaced and they see how the DNC had the whole system rigged for her from the very beginning and the dirty tricks they used to keep it that way, they’re outraged. Bernie supporters have hit the streets in massive numbers in protest…and one thing I saw that warmed my heart was hundreds of them chanting ‘Lock her up!’ about Mrs. Clinton, just like their Republican counterparts.

She may have avoided prison in one of the sleaziest, most disgraceful episodes in American political history, but in the court of public opinion, she’s guilty as hell except among the True Believers and the bought and paid for.

Aside from revealing the dirty tricks used to torpedo Bernie Sanders, the e-mails revealed in full detail exactly how much cynical disdain the the movers and shakers of the Democrat party have for the people and special interest groups they pretend to care about. Jim Hofts at Gateway Pundit has a rundown of links:

DNC member killing horses for insurance money.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/578
DNC making fun of black woman’s name.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942
DNC telling each other, “I love you too. no homo.”
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/425
DNC requesting a pull an MSNBC commentary segment.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107
DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12450
DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with Reuters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102
DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776
DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a “rigged system.”
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8806
DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13762
Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters. Paid shills.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351
$200k for a private dinner with Hillary.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17287
Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366
Faking outrage and pasting in a video later.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102
A mole working inside of the Sanders campaign.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7793
Bringing up Sanders religion to scare anti-semitic voters.
 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508

(Lots more at Gateway Pundit.)

Of course, Dumb Debbie took the heat as fall girl and resigned as DNC head, but most people know that she was only following orders like a Good German. It hasn’t cooled things down at all.

And the same prog fascist tactics are still in evidence now, even after the DNC’s ‘apology’. DNC operatives are roaming all over the arena seizing  any ‘Bernie’ signs they can find, and the DNC even twisted Bernie’s arm to text his young minions and beg them not to protest on the convention floor. So far, it hasn’t done any good at all…Bernie Sanders lit a fire even he can’t control any more.

One amusing sidelight is the fantasy of certain #neverTrump maniacs that Putin is behind the Wikileaks release to help Donald Trump. Such conspiracy theories are always amusing. Vladimir Putin would love to see Hillary elected. She’s corrupt, not too bright and if she becomes troublesome in the least, all he has to do is slide a folder towards her containing copies of some of the juicy e-mails the Russians hacked from her private unsecured server to blackmail her into subservience.

The real fun, of course, will come when Mrs Clinton has to address the convention, which includes over a thousand Bernie Sanders delegates. The DNC might be able to drag off any protesters but delegates?
That’s all Mrs. Clinton needs, especially after Donald Trump threw out a strong, direct message to the Bernie supporters in his speech last week.

I expect the usual suspects to manufacture a ‘bounce’ in the polls, but I think for once, her karma is catching up with her. I mean, does anybody really believe that ‘advocate for women ‘ horse manure?

http://www.snopes.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/clinton-rape-meme.jpg

Stay tuned…

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Dumb Debbie, The DNC And The Wrath Of The Bernistas

. . . → Read More: Dumb Debbie, The DNC And The Wrath Of The Bernistas

When Justice Just Is Not

http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/hillary-laughing.jpg

“Just as every cop is a criminal, and all the sinners saints…” -Mick Jagger,Sympathy For The Devil

“Injustice in the end produces independence” – Voltaire

Well, you can’t say I didn’t call this one. We no longer live in a country where justice for all means anything.

Hillary Clinton is now officially above the law.

Today FBI Director James Comey announced that the FBI would recommend that even though Mrs. Clinton clearly broke the law, she should not face prosecution on criminal charges. And his acrobatics in doing so were something to behold. To summarize, here’s what he said:

  • He spent the first fifteen minutes or so talking about about how Mrs Clinton broke the law with her private servers, negligently handled classified information including e-mails labeled ‘top secret’, the highest classification, that she should have known better, that no person in her position should have compromised America’s security in that way, that foreign intel services from countries hostile to the U.S. may very likely have hacked her unprotected server.

  • That about 800 emails Mrs. Clinton sent to her unprotected private servers contained information that was classified or highly classified at the time they were sent, and another 2000 were up-classified after they were sent. That included eight “Top Secret” chains, 36 with “Secret” information and eight more that were “Confidential.” .

  • That the 30,000 work-related emails Mrs. Clinton refused to turn over to the FBI that were deleted weren’t “intentionally” deleted in order to conceal them. He had various excuses as to why Mrs. Clinton’s lawyers illegally deleted them. And why that not only violates federal law and the legal agreement Mrs. Clinton signed when she became secretary of state but criminal laws on obstruction of justice

  • After spending the first part of his announcement spelling out exactly why Mrs. Clinton should be indicted, Comey dropped the bomb- in spite of her blatant law-breaking, Comey said that no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges, because there’s no evidence she intended to compromise national security.

  • And to cap it all off, he said that while they will likely recommend criminal prosecution in the future for exactly what Mrs. Clinton did, they won’t recommend that Mrs. Clinton be prosecuted.

Let’s look at how many hoops Comey was made to jump through here.

For starters, he had to rewrite Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18). Notice what I’ve emphasized:

(a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or

(b) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or

(c) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

Well, based on what James Comey had to say, Mrs. Clinton blatantly violated federal law here. And we haven’t even gotten to the Records Management Act by Federal Agencies, 44 U.S. Code Chapter 31.

She clearly violated § 3101, Records management by agency heads by deleting the e-mails and by, as Huma Abedin admitted under oath, destroying her legally required calendar of meetings and appointments.

§ 3105 – Safeguards, which mandates that the head of a federal agency must establish safeguards against the loss or destruction of federal records, and that ‘records in the custody of the agency are not to be alienated (accessed by people who shouldn’t have them) or destroyed except in accordance with sections 3301–3314 of this title.’

And § 3106 – Unlawful removal, destruction of records, which speaks for itself.

Mrs. Clinton also likely perjured herself before congress during the Benghazi hearings based on what the FBI director had to say today.

So how did Comey justify saying no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges? Well, first of all he lied and said he couldn’t find any legal precedents. I suppose he never heard of Scooter Libbey, General David Petraeus, Bradley (Chelsea) Manning, Edward Snowden and Jonathan Pollard, just to name a few.

And second, he used an old lawyer’s trick. He brought up the supposed lack of intent as a reason not to charge Mrs. Clinton in an attempt to divert us from the actual issue.

If a drunk driver runs into another vehicle and kills or injures someone, obviously he or she never intended to do so. Few if any people do, yet they are prosecuted just the same. The laws I’ve cited above have nothing to do with intent, but with the gross negligence which even James Comey admitted Hillary Clinton was guilty of. That’s why congress criminalized gross negligence when it comes to classified material and other official documents.

And James Comey knows this very well.  So why the bizarre performance today? Why not just say that based on his investigation, there was no grounds to prosecute instead of spending a quarter of an hour telling the nation exactly why Mrs. Clinton should be prosecuted before telling us he had no intention of recommending that course of action? Besides, shouldn’t the FBI let the prosecutor decide that without tainting their reputation?

It’s really not that difficult to figure out, at least the way I see it.

The fix was obviously in for some time, and James Comey was fully aware of it. I’m not sure what kind of horse’s head the Obama Administration and the Clintons put in Comey’s bed to get him on board, but it must have been substantial. And to add  that, he was likely told that even if he did recommend prosecution, Loretta Lynch was going to see to it that it never went anywhere. So why destroy himself for nothing?

 

Meanwhile, he probably felt he had to make at least some attempt to try to redeem his own honor and that of the FBI, so he actually conducted an investigation to keep his agents’ morale up… and to send a message to the American people that regardless of the decision he was forced to make, Hillary Clinton really was guilty as charged. That, I think, is why he took the time to essentially make the case for indicting her before swallowing the bitter pill at the end. I’m guessing a bit here, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that part of Comey’s act was not exactly in the script and he might end up resigning after a few months so as not to make it too obvious.

So the meeting between our Attorney General and Bill Clinton was simply to get the final details and the timing straightened out. And it’s no coincidence that two days after her meeting with Mr. Bill, the Justice department filed a motion in federal court seeking a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation,which is supposedly being investigated over all those lucrative speaking fees and huge donations to the Clinton Foundation that came from foreign countries and large corporations who just happened to have business pending at the State Department while Mrs. Clinton was running it.That isn’t going to go anywhere either, and never mind that our attorney general met with a potential witness to both investigations. After all, this was a situation where there was a home brew server with classified information in Bill Clinton’s basement at the Clinton Foundation. And a back up in somebody’s bathroom somewhere.

http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/not-elect-hillary-secret.png

Needless to say, that too will fade into the woodwork.

So, where do we go from here?

Mrs Clinton and her execrable media allies will of course celebrate this as a victory and an exoneration, although  even a few of the usual suspects appear to be having some doubts. The Obama Administration is probably the most lawless in our history, and their contempt and that of the Clintons for their fellow citizens beggars the imagination. They no longer even feel the need to hide it anymore.

I’ve already heard some of the pious outrage from the other side, and I have to admit that it surprises me, just a little. We’ve been ruled by these criminal swine for almost eight years now, and they’ve amply demonstrated their contempt for us, our country’s laws and our Constitution. And they’ve gotten away with it countless times, even with ‘Republicans’ controlling congress. Did anyone expect something different? Really?

A lot is going to depend on how the American people react to this, just four months away from an election. Given how common it has become to lie to pollsters, we probably won’t know until after November when the votes are counted.

There may actually be a silver lining here. It’s just possible that enough people may have gotten to the point where they’re disgusted enough  to no longer even to consider putting this corrupt snake in office. And it’s less likely but not impossible that the GOP establishment who have been scheming to sabotage Donald Trump either at the convention or during the campaign are going to wake up and realize exactly what a Hillary Clinton presidency is going to be like.

As for Donald Trump and whomever his running mate is, they now have some fresh, redolent substance in recent public memory behind the label ‘Crooked Hillary.’ They need to remind the American public about that at every opportunity. We’ll soon see if we keep our Republic.

And here’s another thought on the matter.

When those in power engage in this any means to an end Alinskyite hustle, they never stop to think of the message it sends, and how it could backfire.

While it has sometimes been imperfectly administered in practice, America has always been based on the ideal that everyone is equal before the law. Take away that expectation and you lay the seeds not just for contempt for the law but for those whom claim to govern legally.  And that can lead to unanticipated consequences.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading When Justice Just Is Not

. . . → Read More: When Justice Just Is Not

Welcome To The Left’s Carny Show

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--QxqaS2ezFE/Tasy4N23GCI/AAAAAAAAAWA/gZOH6sqIu-U/s1600/Carny+Clown+and+Barker.jpg

Ever been to a real live carnival and watched the barkers lure the rubes in? The basic premise is always one of illusion, which means distracting people from reality with the promise of something special to see or the winning of a prize playing one of the ‘games of chance’ while taking them for as much as you can. Let’s go to the carny show and have some fun, shall we?

Step right up! Here’s your chance and we have some great  exhibits.

Here’s exhibit number one….Donald Trump’s phony charity, especially towards veterans.

He didn’t raise any $6 million, and he held on to the money he did raise for too long, right? He lied! He only raised $5.6 million, including $1 million he kicked in himself.

Look over here, not at that other booth housing the Clinton Foundation exhibit.Trust me, folks, there’s nothing you want to see there!

Oh, OK let’s take a look anyway if you really feel you must. Aw, c’mon…do we really need to watch  what Mr. Trump and a certain Marine combat vet have to say?

Oh my…let’s make sure we cut the Marine out when we show this on CNN, m’kay? Just leave in the part about him bullying a reporter and calling him a sleaze. Yeah, that’s the story.

Oh and you don’t want to look at this part of the Clinton exhibit either….well if you must, you must. Yeah, these are just boring figures from Form 990 charities use to report their figures. Trust me, it’s…well, OK. Some guy named Don Surber put this stuff together…damned bloggers.

http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/AP999317622685.jpg

The [Clinton] foundation’s latest Form 990 shows that as of December 31, 2014, Hillary and Bill and Chelsea and their hedge fund son-in-law sat on $439,505,295 in assets. That’s pretty good for a “non-profit.”

In 2014, they received $24,313,685 in contributions and $113,957,283 in grants, including government grants.

That $439 million in assets is 17 times larger than that $25 million hedge fund that son-in-law ran into the ground by hedging on Greek debt. That $439 million represents a hefty investment fee for some person or company lucky enough to land the account.

The foundation spent $248,221,698 in 2014:

$95,887,139 on salaries and benefits.

$20,786,529 on travel.

$17,249,876 on professional and consulting services.

$14,200,147 on conferences and events.

$14,196,240 on UNITAID commodities expense

$13,519,824 on meetings and training.

Et cetera. Oh and $33,692,599 was spent on direct program expenditures. Sure, this is all legal, but as a charity, this is not on the up and up. The Clintons used this as a way to launder foreign donations (which would be illegal if they were campaign donations) to finance her campaign in absentia.

See, I told you it was boring. It wasn’t ? But hey, LOOK AT DONALD TRUMP’S FOUNDATION!

His latest Form 990 as of 2012 shows $1,259,851 in income, all from Trump. $1,712,089 in disbursements to various charities, and a total of $1,717,293, in assets. Looky at all the expenses! What’s this $5,305? Oh, just the audit cost, and Trump paid for it himself based on the figures? Sounds fishy to me. Like I said, this is real news, not the stuff about the Clinton Foundation. Just forget about that, OK?

Let’s go to the next exhibit…hey, the bogus Trump University! What a scandal huh? Donald Trump fleecing all those poor people, no wonder he’s being sued. No, don’t go back to the Clinton exhibit. You don’t need to know about CGI University and the Clintons, it’s nothing important. trust me. No one’s interested in that. No one important, anyway.

And no, please don’t go back there behind the curtain! OK, so the Trump University thing is a little exaggerated. Quiet down, let’s keep this between ourselves and I’ll level with you, OK?

Turns out this got started after Trump refused to donate to New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s campaign in spite of repeated ‘suggestions.’ It’s just a coincidence, honest that Trump was slapped with a $40 million law suit by Schneiderman after that against Trump University in 2013 charging fraud. Would I lie? Now who did donate to Schneiderman were some lawyers from a law firm named Robbins, Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.

The next step was a U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel who certified a class action suit and selected two law firms, long time Democrat bundlers and contributors and both heavy Clinton donors to find plaintiffs and represent the class action case against Trump University. The two firms were – wait for it – Robbins, Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP and Zeldes Haeggquist & Eck LLP.

Did I mention that Judge Curiel was a long time Democrat activist and an Obama appointee, one of those judges Democrat majority leader Senator Harry Reid shoved through via the nuclear option? Oh, you knew that, really?

Well, I’ll tell you, once those lawyers started trolling for plaintiffs, a whole crowd of folks responded wanting to be part of the suit. OK, OK, gimmee a break, so yeah, it was only six plaintiffs, and the judge allowed three of them to withdraw from the class action after they panicked and realized that rather than the easy payday the lawyers told them about they could be liable for costs instead.

The main plaintiff, a yoga instructor named Tarla Makaeff, who filed the suit against Trump in 2010 wants out as well, and believe it or not, Judge Curiel has ruled that after six years of litigation, she can leave because the judge says her deposition for her lawyers is sufficient for Trump’s lawyers to defend the case …no cross examination, no deposition by Trump’s attorneys, no nothing.

But let’s move on, because here’s our main exhibit – Donald Trump the bigot!

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_TO4ELq-amU/VmNKXS6JblI/AAAAAAAABGk/0K8kZ1D_4Z4/s1600/Adolph_Trump.png

Oh Yeah! How dare he insinuate that Judge Curiel might not give him a fair trial just because of the judges ethnicity! All the judge did was to rule that a plaintiff Trump’s lawyers have built their case on need not be deposed or cross examined by them, and to unilaterally decide to unseal court documents ‘by mistake’ without redacting them for personal information at the request of The Washington Post, including plaintiff accusations against Trump University.

Everybody knows how impartial judges are, right? OK, this judge has made a few errors that would probably lead to a reversal on appeal of any verdict he delivers, but we’re all only human, aren’t we?

Oh, the La Raza thing. You heard about that huh? Well you know, it’s just a civil rights group. In Spanish, it means ‘the people’ that’s all.

Oh you ummm, speak Spanish. And you say ‘the people’ in Spanish would be ‘la gente’ or ‘el pueblo’ which means literally the town, and is also used to mean ‘the community.’ OK, so La Raza means the race. So what?

OK,OK…so it’s not a civil rights group, not really. So maybe Judge Curiel, aside from being a very leftist Democrat is a long time pro-Amnesty and pro open borders activist. That doesn’t mean he isn’t impartial. What difference does that make. Just look at Judge Vaughn Walker in California on same sex marriage. Wasn’t he impar…bad example, forget I said that.

But look at Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, remember how she said that a wise Latina would…better forget about that one too.

So what you’re telling me essentially is this…that what Donald Trump is saying is that Judge Curiel is likely to be biased against him and not treat him fairly because the judge is a rabid, partisan Democrat and Trump is the Republican nominee in an election year? And because the judge is very leftist Latino who favors border control and an end to illegal migration? Is that it?

Who ever heard of such a crackpot idea? That’s crazy talk!

You know, you really annoy me. We spent a lot of time and money putting this show together and you go and ruin it for everybody. Get out and don’t come back.

No refunds either, read the sign. Racists!

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Welcome To The Left’s Carny Show

. . . → Read More: Welcome To The Left’s Carny Show

Washington Post Allows Cartoonist to Hatefully Attack Ted Cruz’s Kids

http://images.christianpost.com/full/90664/ted-cruz.jpg?w=262

The Left is on a jihad to teach us differently, but Senator Ted Cruz, like most politicians, understands that most Americans approve of traditional family values and like to see them reflected in the people they elect to office. This is common sense on their part – a man or woman with a family to protect and care for has a stake in society and his or her decisions are going to reflect that.

If the family is photogenic, that’s also a plus. And as anyone who’s ever run for office will tell you, running for office is a time consuming, demanding enterprise. And having the spouse and kids along when possible gives the family a little more time to spend together.

So Ted Cruz decided to have some fun with his family doing a commercial with a Christmas theme. It’s political of course, but in a lighthearted and witty way modeled on the old Saturday Night Live faux commercials. Anyone with a sense of humor should be able to appreciate it, even if you disagree with Senator Cruz’s positions:

http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoonist/images/TelnaA.jpg?

That when Washington Post editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes decided to attack Cruz’s five and seven year old daughters, depicting them in a racist cartoon as mindless dancing monkeys, with Senator Ted Cruz as the organ grinder. You can see this on twitter in a gif she created here.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2474487.1450839817!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/cruz23n-2-web.jpg
Her excuse for this viciousness was that if they were ‘props’ in the ad, they were ‘fair game.’

Oh really? I wonder what the reaction would be if a major outlet like the Washington Post used that logic to depict the kids in this political ad as monkeys? Malia and Sasha appear about twenty minutes in:

Embedded image permalink

Or how about the quaint little family group pictured in this political ad below?

After a major outcry, Washington Post editor  Fred Hiatt removed the cartoon and Ann Telnaes’ lame explanation with this comment :

Editor’s note from Fred Hiatt: It’s generally been the policy of our editorial section to leave children out of it. I failed to look at this cartoon before it was published. I understand why Ann thought an exception to the policy was warranted in this case, but I do not agree.

He ‘failed to look at it?’ He’s supposedly the editor and he just let this go through without even taking the ten seconds it would take to glance at it and see this for what it was?  I’d certainly like to give him the benefit of the doubt, but given the Washington Post’s ideological positions, it’s not easy. Especially since the Left has always crossed that line, with some honorable exceptions. Just ask the Palin kids or the Bush twins.

And there’s also the fact that this is blatant racism, since Cruz and his children have Cuban ancestry. Would a cartoon of Obama’s daughters as monkeys  have ever gotten by the WAPO’s editors? And if it had, can you imagine the headlines, and perhaps even the racial violence in response?  Hiatt and Telnaes would be fortunate merely to be fired and allowed to leave town in one piece. Needless to say, since its Ted Cruz and he has an ‘R’ after his name, they’ll merely remove the cartoon, issue a lame response that isn’t even classy enough to be an apology and perhaps just chuckle among themselves about it in private.

Ted Cruz was his usual classy self in response, of course :
cruz_response_to_washington_post_racism_12-22-15-1
 Actually.. they are indeed out of her league, not that it’s a very high bar. Their father and mother have obviously raised them with a sense of decency, of right and wrong. Ms. Telnaes obviously never had the benefit of that sort of thing.

Unfortunately, she’s just the first one out of the box. Rest assured that if Ted Cruz’s star continues to rise, you’re going to see a lot more of this.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Washington Post Allows Cartoonist to Hatefully Attack Ted Cruz’s Kids

. . . → Read More: Washington Post Allows Cartoonist to Hatefully Attack Ted Cruz’s Kids

Something No One’s Mentioning About Ben Carson And West Point

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson speaks at the North Texas Presidential Forum hosted by the Faith & Freedom Coalition and Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas October 18, 2015. (REUTERS/Mike Stone)

Today’s media attack du jour on a Republican presidential candidate  comes from the very left leaning Politico.

Politico’s Kyle Cheney claims that unnamed ‘representatives of the campaign’ admitted to them that Ben Carson’s story about his application and acceptance into the U.S. Military Academy at West Point” was fabricated.

“Ben Carson’s campaign on Friday admitted, in a response to an inquiry from POLITICO, that a central point in his inspirational personal story was fabricated: his application and acceptance into the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.”

In response, the Carson campaign responded with this statement (hat tip Daily Caller):

“Dr Carson was the top ROTC student in the City of Detroit. In that role he was invited to meet General Westmoreland. He believes it was at a banquet. He can’t remember with specificity their brief conversation but it centered around Dr. Carson’s performance as ROTC City Executive Officer.

He was introduced to folks from West Point by his ROTC Supervisors. They told him they could help him get an appointment based on his grades and performance in ROTC. He considered it but in the end did not seek admission. There are “Service Connected” nominations for stellar High School ROTC appointments. Again he was the top ROTC student in Detroit. I would argue strongly that an Appointment is indeed an amazing full scholarship. Having ran several Congressional Offices I am very familiar with the Nomination process.

Again though his Senior Commander was in touch with West Point and told Dr. Carson he could get in, Dr Carson did not seek admission.

The Politico story is an outright Lie. Dr. Carson as the leading ROTC student in Detroit was told by his Commanders that he could get an Appointment to the Academy. He never said he was admitted or even applied.

The campaign never “admitted to anything.”

This is what we have come to expect from Politico.”

Before we go on, full disclosure. Dr. Carson is definitely not my choice for the GOP nomination or for president.

According to the Daily Caller, Politico’s Kyle Cheney isn’t responding to inquiries. That’s pretty much standard operating procedure when the story in question is simply a political hit piece. The story goes out there, it becomes a news story, the True Believers and the Soros media outlets publicize it. Then it temporarily dies, as the news cycle moves on…to be revived later as the subject of a push poll, or a campaign attack ad, or snarky references on left wing blogs later on. Because, you see,it has been implanted in people’s skulls so they will recall it when it’s brought up perhaps months later.

This isn’t even remotely journalism. It’s a political contribution in kind, rather than money on the table.

But in fairness, I have to say that Dr. Carson may have expanded his original story in an fairly insignificant way.

I’m fairly familiar how West Point operates. In order to get in, you need to not only meet their stellar requirements when it comes to grades, test scores and other activities that indicate leadership, you have to be nominated by a sitting senator or member of the House. Here’s how it usually works, from West Point’s own site:


“The majority of the Members of Congress use a competitive nomination process, whereby 10 candidates are named to compete for a single vacancy. A minority of the members of Congress names a single candidate as their primary nomination, and some choose to number, or rank order the alternates. If you have an excellent academic and extracurricular activity record, however, you have a good chance of gaining admission with an alternate nomination. Each year several hundred of the best qualified alternate Congressional and military service nominees are offered admission from the West Point waiting list. “

So what likely happened is that a young Ben Carson met General Westmoreland at an affair of some sort, the General suggested he apply for West Point and maybe he had a conversation with some admissions people about the process. But him getting in was predicated on him being formally nominated by a member of congress either as an appointee or as an alternate on the waiting list. So the admissions people he spoke to had no power to get him in. he probably thought about it fo ra few minutes and decided to take his talents elsewhere, hardly unique for a high school senior.

Another point – all appointees to any of the U.S. military academy get a full scholarship…in exchange for agreeing to serve as officers for a given number of years in exchange. Dr. Carson’s mildly embellishes that fact to make a ‘full scholarship’ seem like something special, when simply being appointed and admitted would have been the real accomplishment.

Whether the mild inflation even bears mentioning compared to the serial lies and contempt for the law evidenced by another presidential candidate, I leave it to you to decide.

http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-bookmark-en.gif

Continue reading Something No One’s Mentioning About Ben Carson And West Point

. . . → Read More: Something No One’s Mentioning About Ben Carson And West Point

CNBC’s GOP ‘Debate’ – Ted Cruz Shows The Emperor Has No Clothes

I have to admit, I have never seen a spectacle like this before. Just when I think the Leftist media has struck bottom, they dig a new hole even deeper. CNBC’s ‘moderators’ made no secret of their political bias or their disgust and hatred of every can…

Continue reading CNBC’s GOP ‘Debate’ – Ted Cruz Shows The Emperor Has No Clothes

. . . → Read More: CNBC’s GOP ‘Debate’ – Ted Cruz Shows The Emperor Has No Clothes