Warning: Parameter 2 to SyndicationDataQueries::posts_search() expected to be a reference, value given in /home4/sattek/roguepolitics.com/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 298

Warning: Parameter 2 to SyndicationDataQueries::posts_where() expected to be a reference, value given in /home4/sattek/roguepolitics.com/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 298

Warning: Parameter 2 to SyndicationDataQueries::posts_fields() expected to be a reference, value given in /home4/sattek/roguepolitics.com/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 298

Warning: Parameter 2 to SyndicationDataQueries::posts_request() expected to be a reference, value given in /home4/sattek/roguepolitics.com/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 298
George Washington « Rogue Politics

Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Alexander Hamilton’s Participation in the Newburgh Conspiracy Reexamined

The following essay is based on a speech, my first public speech about Alexander Hamilton, given on July 28, 2013, at the New Windsor Cantonment in conjunction with the Alexander Hamilton Awareness Society. It is reproduced below after some editing and links added to … Continue reading

Continue reading Alexander Hamilton’s Participation in the Newburgh Conspiracy Reexamined

. . . → Read More: Alexander Hamilton’s Participation in the Newburgh Conspiracy Reexamined

First Entrepreneur by Edward G. Lengel

Edward Lengel portrays a side of Washington that is frequently referenced in other books, but not explored to degree of the First Entrepreneur. Continue reading First Entrepreneur by Edward G. Lengel . . . → Read More: First Entrepreneur by Edward G. Lengel

Our Country’s Father’s Advice on his Retirement

Note: I see that this got rather long, I sort of regret that but, Washington had a long and distinguished career, from the study of which we would prosper, if we gave it the appropriate attention. So while I’m going to crave your indulgence of another old man who worries about his country, I am […]

Continue reading Our Country’s Father’s Advice on his Retirement

. . . → Read More: Our Country’s Father’s Advice on his Retirement

Great Reviews

Both of these reviewers did a phenomenal job – the reviews are worth reading on their own merits – especially if one lacks the time to read the books about which they were written. Continue reading Great Reviews . . . → Read More: Great Reviews

The Legacy of George Washington

There used to be two federal holidays in February (plus St. Valentines day!). They honored the two most iconic of Americans, Presidents Washington, and Lincoln. Some years ago they were combined into the insipid President’s day, so that instead of honoring the best presidents for their own individual achievements, we could lump them in with […]

Continue reading The Legacy of George Washington

. . . → Read More: The Legacy of George Washington

A Trump-Cruz Slate, Why Donald Trump Should Go First

Excuse me if I’m repeating myself, but I hold to my position that it isn’t just important to win the 2016 election, but the next eight …

Continue reading A Trump-Cruz Slate, Why Donald Trump Should Go First

. . . → Read More: A Trump-Cruz Slate, Why Donald Trump Should Go First

America’s 1st Thanksgiving Day was a religious event

Our Nation’s first Thanksgiving Day took place on November 26, 1789, and it was a religious event. To the chagrin of the anti-religionists among us today, on September 25, 1789, the first act of Congress after framing the Bill of…

Read more →

Continue reading America’s 1st Thanksgiving Day was a religious event

. . . → Read More: America’s 1st Thanksgiving Day was a religious event

Nothing Less Than a Reformation Will Do

The Invisible Hand If you believe that America was created by an Invisible Hand, then logic requires you to also believe that America was also created for …

Continue reading Nothing Less Than a Reformation Will Do

. . . → Read More: Nothing Less Than a Reformation Will Do

239 Times

Well, we’re still here, and we’re still, whatever the Supreme Court says, still America, and yes, by God’s grace that is so. 239 years ago a group of guys gathered in Philadelphia said loud enough to be heard in London that Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent […]

Continue reading 239 Times

. . . → Read More: 239 Times

The Great Divide The Conflict Between Washington and Jefferson That Defined A Nation By Thomas Fleming

This is an absorbing book that will enlighten many and shock some. Much has been written about Thomas Jefferson’s clash with Alexander Hamilton, but the differences between George Washington and Jefferson have received little attention. The Great Divide rectifies that neglect and more.

Continue reading The Great Divide The Conflict Between Washington and Jefferson That Defined A Nation By Thomas Fleming

. . . → Read More: The Great Divide The Conflict Between Washington and Jefferson That Defined A Nation By Thomas Fleming

In July 1780, Alexander Hamilton received intelligence from Elias Dayton (not the Culper Ring) that helped save the French fleet and American army in Rhode Island

In July 1780, Alexander Hamilton received intelligence from Elias Dayton that helped save the French fleet and American army in Rhode Island. Previously, this intelligence had been incorrectly attributed to the Culper Ring. Below is a condensed extract from Alexander Hamilton: The Formative Years about … Continue reading

Continue reading In July 1780, Alexander Hamilton received intelligence from Elias Dayton (not the Culper Ring) that helped save the French fleet and American army in Rhode Island

. . . → Read More: In July 1780, Alexander Hamilton received intelligence from Elias Dayton (not the Culper Ring) that helped save the French fleet and American army in Rhode Island

For the GOP Candidates: Saving the Character of the Nation Through Common Purpose

“We are placed among the Nations, and have a national character to establish” (George Washington, 1783) “At this auspicious period, the United States came into existence, and if their Citizens should not be completely free and happy, the fault will be entirely their own.” (GW) “A Republic…if you can keepRead More

Continue reading For the GOP Candidates: Saving the Character of the Nation Through Common Purpose

. . . → Read More: For the GOP Candidates: Saving the Character of the Nation Through Common Purpose

Diagramming Our First Revolution, The “Redcoats” Are Coming, Again

The War for Independence, the Revolutionary War, was not a spontaneous fire, set by a bolt of lightning. I don’t know how, or even if, school children are taught the story of America’s leap for freedom in 1776. I doubt there’s as much brass bands and fanfare in the teachingRead More

Continue reading Diagramming Our First Revolution, The “Redcoats” Are Coming, Again

. . . → Read More: Diagramming Our First Revolution, The “Redcoats” Are Coming, Again

The State of the Union: The American Presidency Presiding or Partisan?

On The O’Reilly Factor on the evening of Obama’s health-care “summit” at the White House in 2009, Bill O’Reilly told Laura Ingrahams that the president had done an adequate job in moderating the discussion.  Laura replied, “He is not a moderator; he is the President of the United States.”  O’Reilly provided his own perspective, in admitting that “moderating is not enough in the long-run because the country wants leadership.” The host was only partially correct.

I submit that any country profits by having a presider; from this role, he or she can lead with credibility rather than being perceived as a partisan. For example, President Obama evinced leadership in the interest of the United States as a whole in taking Osama bin Laden out on May 1, 2011. The president could stand for the union as a whole in going after terrorist number 1 without being sidelined by being partisan.  On a more daily basis, this role translates into moderating meetings of partisans rather than being partisan himself. The stature of the president achieved in having stood for the whole, such as in having Osama bin Laden killed, could—if not diluted by partisan positions—give the president sufficient credibility to moderate important meetings of congressional leaders who would otherwise refuse to meet.

For an American president to want the credibility required to effectively moderate meetings involving partisans while at the same time being partisan is to want his cake and to eat it too.  A desire for both is suggestive of a sort of character that might not be sufficiently respect-worthy to preside.  If the American Presidency stands for the union as a whole, the office is inherently oriented to staying above the fray while keeping an eye on the overall interest of the whole.  Perhaps President Obama would have been able to forge a compromise at his health-care summit had he been neutral concerning Democratic and Republican proposals rather than taking on the Republican lawmakers as a partisan.  That is to say, Obama might have been able to have enough sway with the Republicans to effectively preside over the meeting to keep it from going off track. This could involve pushing one side or the other to give a little more when the process would otherwise cease without a resolution.  To be able to nudge either side, the chair must be viewed as credible (i.e., unbiased) by both sides. As it was, any such suggestions of the president were dismissed by the Republicans as motivated by an ulterior motive in line with the Democratic position.

The degeneration of the presidency is evinced by what the State of the Union address has become.  The speech is supposed to be primarily a report on the condition of the union, with prudent recommendations.  The speech is not supposed to be partisan. For one thing, the statesmanship implied in the event itself is undercut if the recommendations become the main event and they are those of the party that the president heads. In other words, the credibility, even in the president’s report of the condition of the union, is undercut if a president uses the speech to push his ideological agenda. The emphasis on such an occasion as The State of the Union is fittingly on the general welfare of the United States as a whole. If half the room is clapping on a consistent basis through the speech, something is wrong.

One of President Obama’s State of the Union Addresses. Imagine the change in content were the media to base evaluations on how low the ratio of half-chamber to full-chamber standing ovations is. 

Barak Obama went to items familiar to his party in his 2013 State of the Union address, presssing for an increase in the minimum wage, for example. Was the president wading too far into the details in order to influence even more policy that that of the “big picture”?  If so, was this at the expense of the statesmanship that properly goes with the event?  Flying above the clouds to get a distant view of how we are doing at the time would have precluded such minor policy recommendations that incidently are very partisan in nature. So too on how to avert automatic budget cuts, the president stuck to the Democratic plan. Alternatively, he could have taken the high road and spoke on the condition of the Union in having almost $17 trillion in federal debt. This would have meant leaving it to the Congress to fiddle with the specifics on how to reduce the deficits.
Similarly, the president “offered Americans a populist economic vision” in his 2012 State of the Union address, “seeking to draw a contrast with his eventual Republican rival and demonstrating the widening policy gulf between the two political parties.” While offering a vision is good on the campaign trail, talking about an ideal for the future is not to describe or even analyze the present state of the Union. The ensuing string of policy proposals was “aimed at buttressing a re-election message that posits him as defender of Americans beset by inequality in the tax code and broader economy.” If there was any doubt that he intended a campaign speech, the Wall Street Journal continues, “he made a point of including policies that appeal to many possible constituencies.” Two hours before the speech, he sent an email to his campaign supporters, writing “Tonight, we set the tone for the year ahead.” This indicates that Obama did not intend to report the condition of the Union at the time. After the speech, Republicans justifiably criticized the speech as “an election-year blueprint.” In short, the encroaching partisanship over the figurehead nature of the office can be seen in how far “State of the Union” speeches have strayed from the constitutional task to report to Congress on the condition of the Union. 

Were the president to resist the urge to over-reach for short-term partisan gain, he would stand to gain so much more credibility in having faith in the power of presiding. As a model to get back to, we might look back to George Washington, whose prior achievements in standing for the alliance gave him sufficient stature to preside.  Hamilton and Jefferson and their allies were able to take up the mantel of partisan leadership in the cabinet, with the President thus freed up to preside over the new system of government and look to the public interest in the whole. Because partisan leadership contaminates presiding leadership, the presiding officer should take care to avoid the former in order to preserve the latter. 


In fact, the delegates at the federal constitutional convention in 1787 intended the Electoral College to keep the popular demand for partisan leadership from infecting the Presidency, and thus the credibility of the office. Crucially, the electors, being selected by state legislatures, were to be once-removed from the passions of the people.  In being tied to the direct popular elections in selecting electors, the state legislatures have unwittingly undone the check safeguarding the presiding role.  Hence it is can be expected that presidents will act on a proclivity to be partisan as per their election campaign. 

The presidency was designed to be occupied with accomplished and notable persons who could be expected to stand for the good of the whole. By virtue of his accomplished stature and self-discipline when it came to partisanship, George Washington was able to effectively preside over the Constitutional Convention of 1786.  There being a presider with stature who resisted the temptation to take sides on every issue, the convention could withstand the infighting and conclude with a finished document at the end of the summer.  In fact, Washington was such an effective presider that he could luxuriate on the final day with a request of his own…that the electorate of a US House seat be 20,000 rather than 30,ooo so the body would be that much more democratic (i.e., the representative being that much closer to the people…that much more knowable on an in-person basis).  The problem is that weighing in on virtually every debate has become the modus operendi of every American President. 

In short, the job description of the presidency was designed for one thing and yet the default has become something quite to the contrary.  This can explain why we witness so many presidents fail. I was not really very surprised in watching two hours of the health-care “summit” that it was basically political theatre.  I was not surprised that Barak Obama had trouble in moderating the discussion without being accused of partisan by Republican participants.  So I was not surprised that the Republicans instinctively distrusted the president’s attempts to moderate the summit meeting.  In such a climate, Barak’s presiding was doomed to failure for lack of credibility.  It really is not his fault; his office had long before been transformed into something that is ill-suited to in design. To ignore something’s design and expect it to do that which undercuts it is a recipe for ineffectiveness.


Sources:


Carol Lee and Laura Meckler, “Obama Makes Populist Pitch,” The Wall Street Journal, January 25, 2012. 

Continue reading The State of the Union: The American Presidency Presiding or Partisan?

. . . → Read More: The State of the Union: The American Presidency Presiding or Partisan?

Resignation Speech of George Washington

We offer our apologies in advance for the atrocious puns employed in the clues for this puzzle. As per the usual, the words for this puzzle are taken from the text below. In this case we are featuring the resignation …

Continue reading Resignation Speech of George Washington

. . . → Read More: Resignation Speech of George Washington

Video Tuesday

Go Air Force And Ben Franklin Conservatism in real life. From The Federalist Eliminate the politics and nearly everyone of any partisan stripe idealizes conservative principles without realizing it. How? Consider the world of sport and fitness. It’s nearly always a fantastic encouragement of individual expression and ability while also promoting a positive community at […] . . . → Read More: Video Tuesday . . . → Read More: Video Tuesday

Happy Thanksgiving

From the Heritage Foundation Thanksgiving Proclamation Issued by President George Washington, at the request of Congress, on October 3, 1789 By the President of the United States of America, a Proclamation. Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His […] . . . → Read More: Happy Thanksgiving . . . → Read More: Happy Thanksgiving

Obamacare; Some Thoughts

It’s probably a fair bet that you’ve already seen this, but it’s cute and pretty much true, funny too. So enjoy It’s a cute video and the problems is speaks of are real enough but its far from funny for those of us (read American taxpayers) paying for this farce. We got charged a multiple […] . . . → Read More: Obamacare; Some Thoughts . . . → Read More: Obamacare; Some Thoughts

Sons of the Father: George Washington and His Proteges

Sons of The Father is a collection of essays written mostly by academic historians. The scholarship of the authors is readily apparent in the quality of the writing. But the essays were not the dry academic prose one might expect from snooty academics. They were uniformly interesting and each culminated in a very useful bibliography tied to the footnotes that the writers used to support their various theses. . . . → Read More: Sons of the Father: George Washington and His Proteges . . . → Read More: Sons of the Father: George Washington and His Proteges

You Really Ought To Go Home

You know there is a group of Americans, and yes, they are epitomized by fighter pilots, whose whole ethos is exemplified by getting it done, quietly and real quick. For these people, it’s all about self-confidence-and competence. I’m one of them (although me flying a fighter jet would be very close to suicide), so is […] . . . → Read More: You Really Ought To Go Home . . . → Read More: You Really Ought To Go Home